Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kaptain_Kantrip" data-source="post: 38201" data-attributes="member: 546">I agree that all the WoTC classbooks have at least a few cool things in them, but I don't agree that they fulfill the job they set out to do in a meaningful manner for most gamers.S&amp;F: 10% usefulDoF: 25% useful.T&amp;B: 75% useful.S&amp;S: 25% useful.MoTW: ????All of them (IMO) should have been as good as T&amp;B, or at least 50% useful as a bare minimum. I understand that not all material appeals to all gamers, but a book should be at least 50% useful to be even worth considering a purchase of it. Stupidly, I bought all the books while rushed or blindly believing (praying, hoping) that they would be better than they were. That's my fault. But it's Wizard's fault for making such poorly executed sourcebooks in the first place, LOL. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kaptain_Kantrip, post: 38201, member: 546"] I agree that all the WoTC classbooks have at least a few cool things in them, but I don't agree that they fulfill the job they set out to do in a meaningful manner for most gamers. S&F: 10% useful DoF: 25% useful. T&B: 75% useful. S&S: 25% useful. MoTW: ???? All of them (IMO) should have been as good as T&B, or at least 50% useful as a bare minimum. I understand that not all material appeals to all gamers, but a book should be at least 50% useful to be even worth considering a purchase of it. Stupidly, I bought all the books while rushed or blindly believing (praying, hoping) that they would be better than they were. That's my fault. But it's Wizard's fault for making such poorly executed sourcebooks in the first place, LOL. :D [/QUOTE]

Verification