Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Numion" data-source="post: 1400754" data-attributes="member: 124">I meant that they don't make the connection d20 &lt;--&gt; D&amp;D compatible. As funny as it may seem, because I even own a few non-WotC pdfs, but they've really not used those themselves. And I've not seen the point of .. um .. pressing the point <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Just saying that a larger portion than the ENWorld members generally think might be totally oblivious to the whole d20 thing. Of course, it's quite sure that d20 had a positive impact on the industry (even created a large portion of the industry almost overnight). But if 3e (and d20) had sucked mechanics-wise, d20 lisence might've not done anything good. At least I would've never jumped on the D&amp;D wagon!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Numion, post: 1400754, member: 124"] I meant that they don't make the connection d20 <--> D&D compatible. As funny as it may seem, because I even own a few non-WotC pdfs, but they've really not used those themselves. And I've not seen the point of .. um .. pressing the point ;) Just saying that a larger portion than the ENWorld members generally think might be totally oblivious to the whole d20 thing. Of course, it's quite sure that d20 had a positive impact on the industry (even created a large portion of the industry almost overnight). But if 3e (and d20) had sucked mechanics-wise, d20 lisence might've not done anything good. At least I would've never jumped on the D&D wagon! [/QUOTE]

Verification