Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Graf" data-source="post: 1150894" data-attributes="member: 3087">This is a fair question. I certainly don't mean to be defensive.While I wasn't expecting positive comments neither was I expecting to have a post about a completely different system (with no comments one way or another from the author on the original) or to get sucked into an arguement/discussion which could be entitled "dexterity rullz".I realize I should probably have expected it, but I didn't. This has been a stimulating thread, even if there hasn't been much analysis going on.If you firmly believe that dexterity is much much more powerful than other stats then I can see thinking the system will have an unbalancing effect. It certainly does make dex more valuble. It -never- occured to me and the posts on this thread haven't really done much to change my opinion.I've never noticed a dex rules thread. I recently ran across an informative set of "Con is much more important than Dex for spellcasters" posts which I found interesting. It jived strongly with my recent gaming experiences. We did have one overpowering high-dex character but he had a natural dex of 32....I tend to post relatively strongly, that's how I communicate. I think that if someone posts something that is basically a list, or basically just a statement without an explaination, then there really isn't much to do but lay out an arguement and move on.</blockquote>