Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
last encounter was totally one-sided
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 6953460" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>1) Tell that to the denialists!</p><p>2) our party has two singleclassed (Cleric and Warlock) and three multiclassed characters. </p><p></p><p>The "fighter" is actually an Eldritch Knight, so you could call that a multiclass of its own. Her only multiclass is quite recent, and is because for some reason the other PCs let her have all the ability score related magic items. She's originally a finesse dualwielder, but now, with Strength, Constitution, Dexterity <em>and</em> Intelligence all at +4 or more, her player dipped a level of Barbarian. Stylistically this allows the character to ditch any armor, but the real value is getting damage resistance twice a day. (Yes, even though rage precludes spellcasting)</p><p></p><p>The monk is a shadow monk with 4(?) levels of battlemaster fighter. A clear example of how WotC forgot their lesson: there are few to no high level martial abilities that come close to the utility and nova-enabling power of Action Surge. I predict most if not all fighters, rangers, barbarians, even paladins and bards will at one point realize two fighter levels give them far more than their next two levels of their main class. (That's not an actual complaint, since Action Surge is a wonderfully cool, elegant, simple yet powerful and enabling ability!)</p><p></p><p>The "ranger" is actually a fighter (battlemaster). The player wanted to play a Ranger, but decided the class just didn't deliver (with all the niggling clashes in action economy, Hunter's Mark and so on) so he asked to be called a Ranger but to really build a Fighter. After all, the Outdoors background really gives you all you need to at least pose as a ranger.</p><p></p><p>Then he has taken actual Ranger levels to his credit, but only after reaching level 6 of Fighter (to grab Sharpshooter and Crossbow Expert asap). I believe he's now Fighter 8/Ranger 6 (but don't quote me on that). After picking up that ranger ability to make an extra attack on the target's buddy (horde breaker?) he decided the Ranger class could no longer give anything useful enough*, and so he went back to Fighter. </p><p></p><p>The main minmaxing claim for this PC is getting four attacks earlier than a dualwielding Fighter would have. Now his regular three attacks isn't as special as it was back then, but still: making attacks at 120 ft range with +10 damage not including poison makes him the group's damage dealer. (We all know that feat is overpowered, but since the player now playing the fighter got to use GWM in the last campaign, we let him use SS in this one. That feat seriously needs to be errataed, though)</p><p></p><p>*) One factor in this is that we all know the campaign OotA is listed at ending at 15th level or so. Thus the Ranger level 11 ability would have been cool, but he didn't want to build towards an ability that would only see any use at the very end of the campaign. After all, I had my doubts I would be capable of stretching the campaign out as much as I have - I made no promises it wouldn't have ended at level 13 or 14.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 6953460, member: 12731"] 1) Tell that to the denialists! 2) our party has two singleclassed (Cleric and Warlock) and three multiclassed characters. The "fighter" is actually an Eldritch Knight, so you could call that a multiclass of its own. Her only multiclass is quite recent, and is because for some reason the other PCs let her have all the ability score related magic items. She's originally a finesse dualwielder, but now, with Strength, Constitution, Dexterity [I]and[/I] Intelligence all at +4 or more, her player dipped a level of Barbarian. Stylistically this allows the character to ditch any armor, but the real value is getting damage resistance twice a day. (Yes, even though rage precludes spellcasting) The monk is a shadow monk with 4(?) levels of battlemaster fighter. A clear example of how WotC forgot their lesson: there are few to no high level martial abilities that come close to the utility and nova-enabling power of Action Surge. I predict most if not all fighters, rangers, barbarians, even paladins and bards will at one point realize two fighter levels give them far more than their next two levels of their main class. (That's not an actual complaint, since Action Surge is a wonderfully cool, elegant, simple yet powerful and enabling ability!) The "ranger" is actually a fighter (battlemaster). The player wanted to play a Ranger, but decided the class just didn't deliver (with all the niggling clashes in action economy, Hunter's Mark and so on) so he asked to be called a Ranger but to really build a Fighter. After all, the Outdoors background really gives you all you need to at least pose as a ranger. Then he has taken actual Ranger levels to his credit, but only after reaching level 6 of Fighter (to grab Sharpshooter and Crossbow Expert asap). I believe he's now Fighter 8/Ranger 6 (but don't quote me on that). After picking up that ranger ability to make an extra attack on the target's buddy (horde breaker?) he decided the Ranger class could no longer give anything useful enough*, and so he went back to Fighter. The main minmaxing claim for this PC is getting four attacks earlier than a dualwielding Fighter would have. Now his regular three attacks isn't as special as it was back then, but still: making attacks at 120 ft range with +10 damage not including poison makes him the group's damage dealer. (We all know that feat is overpowered, but since the player now playing the fighter got to use GWM in the last campaign, we let him use SS in this one. That feat seriously needs to be errataed, though) *) One factor in this is that we all know the campaign OotA is listed at ending at 15th level or so. Thus the Ranger level 11 ability would have been cool, but he didn't want to build towards an ability that would only see any use at the very end of the campaign. After all, I had my doubts I would be capable of stretching the campaign out as much as I have - I made no promises it wouldn't have ended at level 13 or 14. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
last encounter was totally one-sided
Top