Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
last encounter was totally one-sided
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 6956409" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>Optional = all bets are off? </p><p></p><p>I don't think anyone's really gone to that extreme.</p><p></p><p>Optional = play is impacted. Yes, certainly.</p><p></p><p>I don't think that anyone is saying that the designers are without flaw. But neither are DMs. And in the situation you described, I find it hard to fault the designers for the way things went down. I think that you erred in how you handled the scenario. Now, that's not me saying that you couldn't have fixed it...the way you explain things it seems that you were okay with the way things turned out. But I don't think you should attribute the results to the system.</p><p></p><p>I said in a previous post that I don't really use the CR system. I think that most experienced DMs would be better off without it. You designed an encounter that according to that system (although I think some adjustments were in line that were not made) was incredibly deadly. But you knew it was not going to be that deadly. Maybe you thought it would be tougher than it turned out to be...but I won't for one second buy that you created an encounter that far beyond the guidelines without knowing that it wouldn't quite play out that way. </p><p></p><p>So since you know this already, why not just ditch the system? You've outgrown it, I think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 6956409, member: 6785785"] Optional = all bets are off? I don't think anyone's really gone to that extreme. Optional = play is impacted. Yes, certainly. I don't think that anyone is saying that the designers are without flaw. But neither are DMs. And in the situation you described, I find it hard to fault the designers for the way things went down. I think that you erred in how you handled the scenario. Now, that's not me saying that you couldn't have fixed it...the way you explain things it seems that you were okay with the way things turned out. But I don't think you should attribute the results to the system. I said in a previous post that I don't really use the CR system. I think that most experienced DMs would be better off without it. You designed an encounter that according to that system (although I think some adjustments were in line that were not made) was incredibly deadly. But you knew it was not going to be that deadly. Maybe you thought it would be tougher than it turned out to be...but I won't for one second buy that you created an encounter that far beyond the guidelines without knowing that it wouldn't quite play out that way. So since you know this already, why not just ditch the system? You've outgrown it, I think. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
last encounter was totally one-sided
Top