Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Law vs. Chaos - the forgotten conflict
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yesminde" data-source="post: 3688885" data-attributes="member: 54072"><p>Check out L.E. Modesitt's books if you're looking for ideas.</p><p></p><p>Alignment-wise, Lawful and Chaotic have no meaning apart from the second part of alignment they are attached to. Lawful means that you adhere rigorously to some sort of structure . . . *what* structure is never laid out. It is indicated that LE people follow some kind of "internal" code, but what is the point of a structure you make up for yourself? Chaotic people make up their own "rules" too! In the end it seems more like Lawful means that once you *have* a set of rules (regardless of where they come from), you, personally, don't change them.</p><p></p><p>Chaotic is self-contradictory and *reactive*, because it is based on a *rejection* of structure. If you rigorously disobey all the rules, then you're just as ordered as a Lawful person . . . but if you *sometimes* obey the rules and *sometimes* don't, then shouldn't you be *neutral* with respect to the Law/Chaos axis?</p><p></p><p>If you are looking to have a true Law vs. Chaos conflict then you need to have a set of external (to individuals) rules that everyone can reference in order to determine whether a given individual is lawful or chaotic. Namely, you need a set of rules that govern reality (or nature or whatever you want to call it). Chaos, then, is a defiance of reality, a constant striving against the restrictions of nature, whereas Law is an acceptance of natural restrictions and acting in accordance with them.</p><p></p><p>For example: a lawful person accepts the fact that all mortals must die and lives their life accordingly, a chaotic person might live as though he believed he was going to live forever.</p><p></p><p>Depending on your personal viewpoint, you could present Law as possessing a great deal of passivity (would a lawful person seek to *extend* their life by, say, working out and studying medicine and ways to keep people from aging? Or would they just numbly resign themselves to death and not even bother to get some rest if they got sick?). You can also present Chaotic people as living in denial or even nihilistic (would a chaotic person jump at the chance to be undead? Would they get pissed off and devote their lives to "defying" death by becoming some kind of daredevil?)</p><p></p><p>You could even do *all* of the above approaches, so that there was constant debate within both groups as to who belonged to them, which is where your magic could come in: means of detecting whether someone was actually Lawful or Chaotic could be quite valuable! </p><p></p><p>I view a Chaotic person as someone that doesn't even think to discover whether what they desire is actually possible, a Neutral person (on this axis) as one that is aware of the natural rules but follows them or not based on some sort of personal scheme, and a lawful person as one who seeks to command nature by obeying it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yesminde, post: 3688885, member: 54072"] Check out L.E. Modesitt's books if you're looking for ideas. Alignment-wise, Lawful and Chaotic have no meaning apart from the second part of alignment they are attached to. Lawful means that you adhere rigorously to some sort of structure . . . *what* structure is never laid out. It is indicated that LE people follow some kind of "internal" code, but what is the point of a structure you make up for yourself? Chaotic people make up their own "rules" too! In the end it seems more like Lawful means that once you *have* a set of rules (regardless of where they come from), you, personally, don't change them. Chaotic is self-contradictory and *reactive*, because it is based on a *rejection* of structure. If you rigorously disobey all the rules, then you're just as ordered as a Lawful person . . . but if you *sometimes* obey the rules and *sometimes* don't, then shouldn't you be *neutral* with respect to the Law/Chaos axis? If you are looking to have a true Law vs. Chaos conflict then you need to have a set of external (to individuals) rules that everyone can reference in order to determine whether a given individual is lawful or chaotic. Namely, you need a set of rules that govern reality (or nature or whatever you want to call it). Chaos, then, is a defiance of reality, a constant striving against the restrictions of nature, whereas Law is an acceptance of natural restrictions and acting in accordance with them. For example: a lawful person accepts the fact that all mortals must die and lives their life accordingly, a chaotic person might live as though he believed he was going to live forever. Depending on your personal viewpoint, you could present Law as possessing a great deal of passivity (would a lawful person seek to *extend* their life by, say, working out and studying medicine and ways to keep people from aging? Or would they just numbly resign themselves to death and not even bother to get some rest if they got sick?). You can also present Chaotic people as living in denial or even nihilistic (would a chaotic person jump at the chance to be undead? Would they get pissed off and devote their lives to "defying" death by becoming some kind of daredevil?) You could even do *all* of the above approaches, so that there was constant debate within both groups as to who belonged to them, which is where your magic could come in: means of detecting whether someone was actually Lawful or Chaotic could be quite valuable! I view a Chaotic person as someone that doesn't even think to discover whether what they desire is actually possible, a Neutral person (on this axis) as one that is aware of the natural rules but follows them or not based on some sort of personal scheme, and a lawful person as one who seeks to command nature by obeying it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Law vs. Chaos - the forgotten conflict
Top