Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Lawful Stupid Rears its Ugly Head... Again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lalato" data-source="post: 1999993" data-attributes="member: 9171"><p>I believe my character was the only one unconscious during the episode. One other party member was present. There were two characters that didn't see it... mine and another that was trying to escape from a burning building.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>a. It was purse. It contained some money and a gem.</p><p></p><p>b. This one is a little harder to answer. I'll give a bit more background here to help this along. The Paladin himself did not complain about the looting at first. The DM pointed out that this was shady behavior and asked the Paladin what he planned to do about it. This exchange is what caused the "crisis" for the Paladin. I don't think the DM was trying to foment intraparty conflict here. I think, perhaps, he was hoping for the player to come up with an in-character way to handle the situation... but his wording was probably not the best, and I think it caused the player to question his decision for playing a Paladin in the first place. It came down to a discussion of the Paladin's code... that a Paladin couldn't knowingly associate with morally ambiguous people like the Rogue. So... that's a long way of saying that it was the looting of the body that caused the "crisis of faith" for the Paladin, but I don't think the Paladin was upset about the looting so much as he was upset about what that said about the Rogue's moral character.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It snowballed from there into a discussion on how the Paladin should handle the situation regarding morally ambiguous people he associates with. We came to the compromise that the Paladin might see such behavior, and if he chose to question it... he would confront the offending party privately to let him know that it was unacceptable, and that he would be watching out for any future infractions.</p><p></p><p>At any rate... that's when the last session ended so we'll see how it ends up affecting the game in the future. I hope that now that this episode is behind us... we can move forward and have a great campaign.</p><p></p><p>--sam</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lalato, post: 1999993, member: 9171"] I believe my character was the only one unconscious during the episode. One other party member was present. There were two characters that didn't see it... mine and another that was trying to escape from a burning building. a. It was purse. It contained some money and a gem. b. This one is a little harder to answer. I'll give a bit more background here to help this along. The Paladin himself did not complain about the looting at first. The DM pointed out that this was shady behavior and asked the Paladin what he planned to do about it. This exchange is what caused the "crisis" for the Paladin. I don't think the DM was trying to foment intraparty conflict here. I think, perhaps, he was hoping for the player to come up with an in-character way to handle the situation... but his wording was probably not the best, and I think it caused the player to question his decision for playing a Paladin in the first place. It came down to a discussion of the Paladin's code... that a Paladin couldn't knowingly associate with morally ambiguous people like the Rogue. So... that's a long way of saying that it was the looting of the body that caused the "crisis of faith" for the Paladin, but I don't think the Paladin was upset about the looting so much as he was upset about what that said about the Rogue's moral character. It snowballed from there into a discussion on how the Paladin should handle the situation regarding morally ambiguous people he associates with. We came to the compromise that the Paladin might see such behavior, and if he chose to question it... he would confront the offending party privately to let him know that it was unacceptable, and that he would be watching out for any future infractions. At any rate... that's when the last session ended so we'll see how it ends up affecting the game in the future. I hope that now that this episode is behind us... we can move forward and have a great campaign. --sam [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Lawful Stupid Rears its Ugly Head... Again
Top