Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Matt Thomason" data-source="post: 8908614" data-attributes="member: 6777331">Okay, I'd missed that &quot;to publish SRD content&quot;.&nbsp; It'd be better if they said &quot;to publish OUR SRD content&quot;, but reading it that way does carry the implication they are restricting that comment to their own content.I agree with you 100% that they are unable to affect agreements between other parties.&nbsp; My worry was that they might try anyway.&nbsp; At this point it's hard for me to make an assumption WotC will continue to operate in good faith regarding the use of 1.0a.But overall - you agree with my assessment that in order to combine SRD content licensed under 1.2 and non-SRD content licensed under 1.0a I will need to license those in seperate agreements with the relevant parties? The SRD under 1.2, and the non-SRD non-WotC content under the still valid between me and $publisher no matter what WotC say 1.0a?Now THIS sentence worries me <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Would you consider a class by a 3PP that depends upon SRD mechanics &quot;WotC-Connected OGC&quot;, or do you specifically mean WotC-OWNED OGC?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Matt Thomason, post: 8908614, member: 6777331"] Okay, I'd missed that "to publish SRD content". It'd be better if they said "to publish OUR SRD content", but reading it that way does carry the implication they are restricting that comment to their own content. I agree with you 100% that they are unable to affect agreements between other parties. My worry was that they [I]might try anyway[/I]. At this point it's hard for me to make an assumption WotC will continue to operate in good faith regarding the use of 1.0a. But overall - you agree with my assessment that in order to combine SRD content licensed under 1.2 and non-SRD content licensed under 1.0a I will need to license those in seperate agreements with the relevant parties? The SRD under 1.2, and the non-SRD non-WotC content under the [I]still valid between me and $publisher no matter what WotC say[/I] 1.0a? Now THIS sentence worries me :) Would you consider a class by a 3PP that [I]depends upon SRD mechanics[/I] "WotC-Connected OGC", or do you specifically mean WotC-OWNED OGC? [/QUOTE]

Verification