Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tilla the Hun (work)" data-source="post: 1195740" data-attributes="member: 14214">Is it at least semi-legit to consider fomorian and thri-kreen rangers, fighters, sorcs, and clerics?If so, what's the consensus on the ECL for fomorian and thri-kreen?I have a plot line moving into a desert area where reps of the crown (the players) are investigating a mysterious cut off of all traffic into and out of a desert.  My original theory was regarding a fomorian nation encountering a thri-kreen nation (neither of which was known to exist to the crown) in which the resulting war has caused a complete lock down of all trade movement in the area.Now assuming these are semi-civilized nations, I wanted to use fighters, clerics, sorcs, and rangers as classes added to base fomorian and thri-kreen (yes, it's a home brew).  Only problem is, I have a purist in my group whose been frowning at several things that I thought were legit...  Like a pixie wizard/cleric/rogue that specialized in creating magic items and made a rapier that auto-sizes to fit and is enchanted with 'of frost' three times.Since I don't want to lose the player and am willing to rewrite things if I need to - are those classes somewhat legit for those races?  If not, I need help coming with new ideas to explain the lockdown on travel in the desert <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification