Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Z. H. Darkstar" data-source="post: 6798917" data-attributes="member: 6746780">The money for the AL materials already has a source: the D&D Marketing budget. Without a clear view of what this will do for AL play, this simply feels like nickel-and-diming the AL DMs to squeeze blood from a stone.Don't get me wrong. I've been a huge proponent of having AL adventures being sold to the public. However, the AL DMs do plenty of work on the ground level to further the propagation of the program. We should have unfettered access to the adventures in comparison to John Q. Public.Part of what made AL so easy to adopt for FLGS is that there were no charges to run it. Changing that is going to cause friction between FLGS and DM over who has to pay for the PDFs. Not to mention, I would expect FLGS to start charging for play sessions in locations that there was previously no sitting fee. Care and consideration need to go into deciding how this affects the FLGS level. Otherwise, it's one step forward and two steps back.</blockquote>