Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Legand & Lore: Magic Items
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ainamacar" data-source="post: 5698805" data-attributes="member: 70709"><p>I certainly agree with you that there is tension between powerful interesting magic items and keeping character ability in the forefront, but I think you've missed the point that obviates the conundrum: what decoupling magic item power (whether large or small) from character ability would actually enable if done well. This isn't about deciding whether D&D evolves to favor one of trivial or character-defining items, it is about evolving D&D to the point where each table picks whatever balance they want and the system as a whole continues to work. You can even do both in the same game in the sense that the dominant factor varies from character to character, or at different times.</p><p></p><p>All this is dependent on strong guidelines that are reasonably robust, and sufficiently detailed to enable the new DM to run the game successfully. I think that is challenging (and definitely requires thinking about the math) but not impossible. If that is achieved we have many decisive qualitative gains: Low magic works. High magic Monty Haul works. The rich inexperienced kid traveling with the freaking Vow of Poverty monk actually works. Matching risks to rewards works (and for most people would be the usual case) but regardless of the details of that relationship the system doesn't care. All the system should care about is what items and abilities the PCs have right now and provide tools so the DM can challenge that party. That's it. In my opinion the single greatest conceit of D&D is that the party (almost) always faces challenges in keeping with their present capabilities, and the game is aided if it can help us achieve (or knowingly violate) that conceit with the fewest possible additional assumptions.</p><p></p><p>So let the rules of acquisition, and player expectations thereof, be governed by the story, the setting, and the table. For two editions they have been baked into the system itself, but these particular cookies have turned stale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ainamacar, post: 5698805, member: 70709"] I certainly agree with you that there is tension between powerful interesting magic items and keeping character ability in the forefront, but I think you've missed the point that obviates the conundrum: what decoupling magic item power (whether large or small) from character ability would actually enable if done well. This isn't about deciding whether D&D evolves to favor one of trivial or character-defining items, it is about evolving D&D to the point where each table picks whatever balance they want and the system as a whole continues to work. You can even do both in the same game in the sense that the dominant factor varies from character to character, or at different times. All this is dependent on strong guidelines that are reasonably robust, and sufficiently detailed to enable the new DM to run the game successfully. I think that is challenging (and definitely requires thinking about the math) but not impossible. If that is achieved we have many decisive qualitative gains: Low magic works. High magic Monty Haul works. The rich inexperienced kid traveling with the freaking Vow of Poverty monk actually works. Matching risks to rewards works (and for most people would be the usual case) but regardless of the details of that relationship the system doesn't care. All the system should care about is what items and abilities the PCs have right now and provide tools so the DM can challenge that party. That's it. In my opinion the single greatest conceit of D&D is that the party (almost) always faces challenges in keeping with their present capabilities, and the game is aided if it can help us achieve (or knowingly violate) that conceit with the fewest possible additional assumptions. So let the rules of acquisition, and player expectations thereof, be governed by the story, the setting, and the table. For two editions they have been baked into the system itself, but these particular cookies have turned stale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Legand & Lore: Magic Items
Top