Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legend Lore says 'story not rules' (3/4)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6095957" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Well, I won't disagree that little in the way of 4e material has the sheer verbosity of things like the Complete Fighter or Complete Thief books (I don't have the others around so I can't comment, but I assume they are similar from what I recall). Still, a lot of it IS crunch. I mean its VERBOSE, and there are certainly pages and pages of fluff, but there are pages and pages of crunch too, often pages long simply because it has to explain everything in detail since 2e lacks a lot of 'hooks' for things like maneuvers or standard ways of doing things. It seems like the fluff factor could have been higher if the rules had been more clear.</p><p></p><p>If you look at the core 4e books and the core 2e books, the 4e books have actually about the same amount of fluff as 2e does. I do see quite a lot of story ideas, background, and other fluff in the 4e supplements too. I don't know why people insist that 4e is bereft of this stuff, it really is not. There are also 4e books that are very much like the complete books, though organized differently. For instance the Tiefling and Dragonborn books. Notice that WotC discontinued making those sorts of books because presumably they sold poorly. </p><p></p><p>So, yeah, I would agree that few 4e supplements have the fluff to crunch of the Complete books. There are 2 questions I'd ask though. 1) Did TSR actually sell those things in enough numbers to make money? I remember them sitting on book and game store shelves for literally 10 or more years. My FLGS literally STILL HAS a small section of shelf in the back of the store with a full selection of 2e supplements, new stock. 2) Could WotC make money selling that kind of supplement? Note that it is not going to really matter what rules are currently in vogue, 4e, DDN, whatever, such books are going to be largely the same either way, right? Its hard to see how if they didn't sell 2 years ago they will sell next year or the year after.</p><p></p><p>PERSONALLY I'm happy to read some fluffy books. OTOH I have read my 2e fighter, priest, and thief books, and a couple others, through a couple years ago and the fluff is still just as useful now as it was then. I'm not sure these need to be system books. I can see why WotC would want to tie them to an edition, but OTOH I'd prefer to have good high quality material that is system neutral. Honestly, while I found good game ideas in the TSR stuff, I think you can today find VASTLY more accurate, complete, and interesting material on cities, castles, ancient civilizations, Medieval Europe, etc etc etc in non-RPG focused resources. For instance I ran a fanciful game of knights and maidens in distress etc a year or two ago and I found a vast amount of material about medieval romances, as well as translations of all the source material. It was great, and no RPG guide on the subject would come close to providing the same level of material.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6095957, member: 82106"] Well, I won't disagree that little in the way of 4e material has the sheer verbosity of things like the Complete Fighter or Complete Thief books (I don't have the others around so I can't comment, but I assume they are similar from what I recall). Still, a lot of it IS crunch. I mean its VERBOSE, and there are certainly pages and pages of fluff, but there are pages and pages of crunch too, often pages long simply because it has to explain everything in detail since 2e lacks a lot of 'hooks' for things like maneuvers or standard ways of doing things. It seems like the fluff factor could have been higher if the rules had been more clear. If you look at the core 4e books and the core 2e books, the 4e books have actually about the same amount of fluff as 2e does. I do see quite a lot of story ideas, background, and other fluff in the 4e supplements too. I don't know why people insist that 4e is bereft of this stuff, it really is not. There are also 4e books that are very much like the complete books, though organized differently. For instance the Tiefling and Dragonborn books. Notice that WotC discontinued making those sorts of books because presumably they sold poorly. So, yeah, I would agree that few 4e supplements have the fluff to crunch of the Complete books. There are 2 questions I'd ask though. 1) Did TSR actually sell those things in enough numbers to make money? I remember them sitting on book and game store shelves for literally 10 or more years. My FLGS literally STILL HAS a small section of shelf in the back of the store with a full selection of 2e supplements, new stock. 2) Could WotC make money selling that kind of supplement? Note that it is not going to really matter what rules are currently in vogue, 4e, DDN, whatever, such books are going to be largely the same either way, right? Its hard to see how if they didn't sell 2 years ago they will sell next year or the year after. PERSONALLY I'm happy to read some fluffy books. OTOH I have read my 2e fighter, priest, and thief books, and a couple others, through a couple years ago and the fluff is still just as useful now as it was then. I'm not sure these need to be system books. I can see why WotC would want to tie them to an edition, but OTOH I'd prefer to have good high quality material that is system neutral. Honestly, while I found good game ideas in the TSR stuff, I think you can today find VASTLY more accurate, complete, and interesting material on cities, castles, ancient civilizations, Medieval Europe, etc etc etc in non-RPG focused resources. For instance I ran a fanciful game of knights and maidens in distress etc a year or two ago and I found a vast amount of material about medieval romances, as well as translations of all the source material. It was great, and no RPG guide on the subject would come close to providing the same level of material. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legend Lore says 'story not rules' (3/4)
Top