Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legend Lore says 'story not rules' (3/4)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6097285" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Well, Mike has said flat out in no uncertain terms there will be no modules with alternate class mechanics. For instance nothing like a different magic system or AEDU fighters or something like that, period. The modules WotC is providing AFAIK from careful reading and study of everything that has been said and not trying to be overly pedantic or idiotic about how I read it, that much like 2e there will be a series of parts of the game, modules, which will be optional. They will be organized into a Basic (IE all the non-optional parts), a Standard (some optional parts), and an Advanced game (all the optional parts). Obviously individual tables will probably not stick EXACTLY to one of these 3 games, you are expected to say play Basic and maybe add in some specific modules you like. NEVER has WotC ever suggested that they will provide more than one alternative, such as 2 skill systems, etc. to pick from. This new L&L seems to be saying that the focus is not going to be on producing tons of products full of rules. Now, given that ANY supplement is always optional one would kinda have to consider supplements to be "books full of modules" (at least the crunch part, if there is any). </p><p></p><p>I don't rule out the possibility that SOME DAY WotC might decide to make alternative modules, but given the "low crunch" statement and the previous "modules aren't choices of alternate systems" statements, and given the characteristics of DDN as it is now... Yeah, basically I am not getting my preferred play style of out it. I know people are going to tell me to wait and see, and I won't refuse to look at it of course, but are you all going to dredge this back up in 18 months when its dead on? Probably not. So color me EXTREMELY skeptical and IMHO entirely warranted in that skepticism. </p><p></p><p>It isn't a matter of if a compromise is possible or not. WotC WILL NOT PROVIDE US BOTH WITH WHAT WE WANT. No doubt they would be happy to, but either they fail to even vaguely understand what I want, even after I and others told them again and again, or they simply don't really believe their own rhetoric, or they are just in such a disasterously bad position that all they can do is throw some portion of the fan base a life-preserver game and the talk of a 'big tent' was a fond wish. I have no idea which of these, or something else, is the case. I just know what's happening.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6097285, member: 82106"] Well, Mike has said flat out in no uncertain terms there will be no modules with alternate class mechanics. For instance nothing like a different magic system or AEDU fighters or something like that, period. The modules WotC is providing AFAIK from careful reading and study of everything that has been said and not trying to be overly pedantic or idiotic about how I read it, that much like 2e there will be a series of parts of the game, modules, which will be optional. They will be organized into a Basic (IE all the non-optional parts), a Standard (some optional parts), and an Advanced game (all the optional parts). Obviously individual tables will probably not stick EXACTLY to one of these 3 games, you are expected to say play Basic and maybe add in some specific modules you like. NEVER has WotC ever suggested that they will provide more than one alternative, such as 2 skill systems, etc. to pick from. This new L&L seems to be saying that the focus is not going to be on producing tons of products full of rules. Now, given that ANY supplement is always optional one would kinda have to consider supplements to be "books full of modules" (at least the crunch part, if there is any). I don't rule out the possibility that SOME DAY WotC might decide to make alternative modules, but given the "low crunch" statement and the previous "modules aren't choices of alternate systems" statements, and given the characteristics of DDN as it is now... Yeah, basically I am not getting my preferred play style of out it. I know people are going to tell me to wait and see, and I won't refuse to look at it of course, but are you all going to dredge this back up in 18 months when its dead on? Probably not. So color me EXTREMELY skeptical and IMHO entirely warranted in that skepticism. It isn't a matter of if a compromise is possible or not. WotC WILL NOT PROVIDE US BOTH WITH WHAT WE WANT. No doubt they would be happy to, but either they fail to even vaguely understand what I want, even after I and others told them again and again, or they simply don't really believe their own rhetoric, or they are just in such a disasterously bad position that all they can do is throw some portion of the fan base a life-preserver game and the talk of a 'big tent' was a fond wish. I have no idea which of these, or something else, is the case. I just know what's happening. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legend Lore says 'story not rules' (3/4)
Top