Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legend Lore says 'story not rules' (3/4)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 6098979" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Well, encounter design does need some thought. OTOH I do a LOT of mine on the fly these days. I'll often find maps, or draw a few maps, of areas that the PCs are quite likely to visit, and lists of creatures/NPCs that go with them. So I can have a few basic templates, and then if I need a story element to go in, it will. IME this has taken less and less of my time and energy over the last couple years, so now I might spend 30-40 minutes a week specifically on encounters. I can spend my other hours on all the other stuff. I'd say I had to do all this in the old days when I basically tried to emulate TSR modules roughly. It was just not quite as easy, even if AD&D might be a bit more forgiving in terms of encounter design.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you can always add more variety of subsystems on top of a simple core. In essence that is ALMOST what D&D did at the very start, except Gary seemed to have this bizarre idea that he shouldn't use his simple core for everything and make up something else more complex. Complexity had cache back then. 4e did no more than go back and actually use (and invert, but that's minor) the ability check mechanic and make it the main one. If you want to roll initiative with d6 or suprise checks ala AD&D, or have reaction rolls that use a different set of CHA bonuses and use d% go for it. The point is if you START with the consistent core mechanics then you're good, you can go from there. It seems quite a bit harder to remove all that stuff if it is already there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 6098979, member: 82106"] Well, encounter design does need some thought. OTOH I do a LOT of mine on the fly these days. I'll often find maps, or draw a few maps, of areas that the PCs are quite likely to visit, and lists of creatures/NPCs that go with them. So I can have a few basic templates, and then if I need a story element to go in, it will. IME this has taken less and less of my time and energy over the last couple years, so now I might spend 30-40 minutes a week specifically on encounters. I can spend my other hours on all the other stuff. I'd say I had to do all this in the old days when I basically tried to emulate TSR modules roughly. It was just not quite as easy, even if AD&D might be a bit more forgiving in terms of encounter design. I think you can always add more variety of subsystems on top of a simple core. In essence that is ALMOST what D&D did at the very start, except Gary seemed to have this bizarre idea that he shouldn't use his simple core for everything and make up something else more complex. Complexity had cache back then. 4e did no more than go back and actually use (and invert, but that's minor) the ability check mechanic and make it the main one. If you want to roll initiative with d6 or suprise checks ala AD&D, or have reaction rolls that use a different set of CHA bonuses and use d% go for it. The point is if you START with the consistent core mechanics then you're good, you can go from there. It seems quite a bit harder to remove all that stuff if it is already there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legend Lore says 'story not rules' (3/4)
Top