Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Legends and Lore: Customized Complexity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dire Bare" data-source="post: 5726677" data-attributes="member: 18182"><p>Regarding Pathfinder's open playtesting and the launch of 4E . . . when looked at as a whole, I do think that 4E's launch was rife with problems and a "failure", but that the game itself succeeded quite well despite the rocky start, which had nothing to do with playtesting. Important to remember with Pathfinder's open playtesting is that Paizo was INNOVATING and trying something no other RPG publisher had done before (I think, at least no other MAJOR publisher). WotC didn't "fail" or make a mistake by not doing something similar with 4E. But WotC did see how successful Pathfinder has become, which is in part owed to that initial year of open playtesting. RPG fans are a nerdy bunch and REALLY like being included in design. Also the reason why Bauer's Open Design (the Kobold Quarterly guy) has also been a success.</p><p></p><p>So, today, WotC's D&D team is under new leadership and is taking things one step further and is sharing the initial stages of design. The discussions Mearls and Cook are having in the Legends & Lore columns are the types of discussions that ALWAYS happen early in the design process, but rarely shared with gamers. Paizo didn't even go this far with Pathfinder. Once we get past this stage will WotC continue to develop D&D in such an open fashion? Signs are pointing that way, but we'll have to wait and see.</p><p></p><p>Where is this going? Is all this talk about variable complexity going to be a second attempt at a revamped 4th Edition? Will it be a 5th Edition? Does it matter what we call it? I think we are quite a ways out from the "new" D&D, regardless of what form it takes, and that things will morph and change quite a bit before this ride is over. Which, is part of the whole point of an open design process.</p><p></p><p>I do chuckle at some of the suspicious and charged language some folks are using. The fears that WotC is somehow trying to fool us or manipulate us are absurd. These L&L columns are exactly what they are, D&D designers playing in the initial stages of design, but this time in an "open design" model rather than a behind-closed-doors model.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dire Bare, post: 5726677, member: 18182"] Regarding Pathfinder's open playtesting and the launch of 4E . . . when looked at as a whole, I do think that 4E's launch was rife with problems and a "failure", but that the game itself succeeded quite well despite the rocky start, which had nothing to do with playtesting. Important to remember with Pathfinder's open playtesting is that Paizo was INNOVATING and trying something no other RPG publisher had done before (I think, at least no other MAJOR publisher). WotC didn't "fail" or make a mistake by not doing something similar with 4E. But WotC did see how successful Pathfinder has become, which is in part owed to that initial year of open playtesting. RPG fans are a nerdy bunch and REALLY like being included in design. Also the reason why Bauer's Open Design (the Kobold Quarterly guy) has also been a success. So, today, WotC's D&D team is under new leadership and is taking things one step further and is sharing the initial stages of design. The discussions Mearls and Cook are having in the Legends & Lore columns are the types of discussions that ALWAYS happen early in the design process, but rarely shared with gamers. Paizo didn't even go this far with Pathfinder. Once we get past this stage will WotC continue to develop D&D in such an open fashion? Signs are pointing that way, but we'll have to wait and see. Where is this going? Is all this talk about variable complexity going to be a second attempt at a revamped 4th Edition? Will it be a 5th Edition? Does it matter what we call it? I think we are quite a ways out from the "new" D&D, regardless of what form it takes, and that things will morph and change quite a bit before this ride is over. Which, is part of the whole point of an open design process. I do chuckle at some of the suspicious and charged language some folks are using. The fears that WotC is somehow trying to fool us or manipulate us are absurd. These L&L columns are exactly what they are, D&D designers playing in the initial stages of design, but this time in an "open design" model rather than a behind-closed-doors model. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Legends and Lore: Customized Complexity
Top