Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RHGreen" data-source="post: 5621311">I think people are assuming it will be exactly like essentials versus core.&nbsp;I think what he is suggesting is thus:&nbsp;FIGHTER (Basic Foundation)&nbsp;PART 1: PRESET 1PART 2: PRESET 2PART 3: PRESET 3PART 4: PRESET 4ETC...&nbsp;FIGHTER (Advanced Customized)&nbsp;PART 1: PRESET 1PART 2: MEGA BATTLEAXE WOOPASSPART 3: PRESET 3PART 4: SPINNING GOD FANGLEETC...&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;What I think he means is that you have a default optioned foundation to each class. But if you aren't happy with certain parts, or if you prefer the look of some customizable options, you swap your default options for something else more complex and fussy. But the default non-hassle foundation is still playable and competitive.&nbsp;This way you can turn up the dial of complexity of your character. If you want simple leave the class at foundation. If you want a bit more spice swap out a bit of stuff. If you want something really fussy and complex you could swap out everything.&nbsp;This makes sense to me and should be good and make everyone happy (I know - what drugs has somebody slipped me - they'd probably moan that the whole thing isn't completely built with them in mind like they are the centre of the universe.)&nbsp;What would be even better is if a learner could start with the default class and if they felt competent enough to handle the complexity they could swap out some of the default options later to customize on the fly. This way a beginner would not feel they were stuck with a simple boring class for the rest of a campaign (not that they couldn't just rebuild it later anyway.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RHGreen, post: 5621311"] I think people are assuming it will be exactly like essentials versus core. I think what he is suggesting is thus: FIGHTER (Basic Foundation) PART 1: PRESET 1 PART 2: PRESET 2 PART 3: PRESET 3 PART 4: PRESET 4 ETC... FIGHTER (Advanced Customized) PART 1: PRESET 1 PART 2: MEGA BATTLEAXE WOOPASS PART 3: PRESET 3 PART 4: SPINNING GOD FANGLE ETC... What I think he means is that you have a default optioned foundation to each class. But if you aren't happy with certain parts, or if you prefer the look of some customizable options, you swap your default options for something else more complex and fussy. But the default non-hassle foundation is still playable and competitive. This way you can turn up the dial of complexity of your character. If you want simple leave the class at foundation. If you want a bit more spice swap out a bit of stuff. If you want something really fussy and complex you could swap out everything. This makes sense to me and should be good and make everyone happy (I know - what drugs has somebody slipped me - they'd probably moan that the whole thing isn't completely built with them in mind like they are the centre of the universe.) What would be even better is if a learner could start with the default class and if they felt competent enough to handle the complexity they could swap out some of the default options later to customize on the fly. This way a beginner would not feel they were stuck with a simple boring class for the rest of a campaign (not that they couldn't just rebuild it later anyway.) [/QUOTE]

Verification