Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="S'mon" data-source="post: 5733041" data-attributes="member: 463">Yeah, I think GMs tend to bring up examples of poor play, and players bring up examples of poor GMing, more often than they discuss the usual good play - eg I love both my current campaigns and their players, but I don't talk about it that much - I tend to say things like &quot;Turns out 4e + Wilderlands is great for sandboxing!&quot; rather than &quot;Jasper is a great sandboxing player!&quot;, say, or go into all the ways James, Al, Catherine, Kimberly Pauley and Damian in my Loudwater game are super-cool.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:"&nbsp; data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" />I think there's only a few posters at ENW who take a 'most players/DMs suck' view - Hussar on DMs and Kzach on players are the two that have made a lasting impression on me.&nbsp; But I can't recall anyone who's made an equal impression with a 'most players/DMs are great!&quot; attitude.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="S'mon, post: 5733041, member: 463"] Yeah, I think GMs tend to bring up examples of poor play, and players bring up examples of poor GMing, more often than they discuss the usual good play - eg I love both my current campaigns and their players, but I don't talk about it that much - I tend to say things like "Turns out 4e + Wilderlands is great for sandboxing!" rather than "Jasper is a great sandboxing player!", say, or go into all the ways James, Al, Catherine, Kimberly Pauley and Damian in my Loudwater game are super-cool. :cool: I think there's only a few posters at ENW who take a 'most players/DMs suck' view - Hussar on DMs and Kzach on players are the two that have made a lasting impression on me. But I can't recall anyone who's made an equal impression with a 'most players/DMs are great!" attitude. [/QUOTE]

Verification