Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Legends and Lore: Preserving the Past
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nyronus" data-source="post: 5709840" data-attributes="member: 93419"><p>Um, the reason there were "howls of nerdrage" was because the penalty was RETARDEDLY HARSH, while the benefit was nothing but. It was giving up half your turn to gain very limited access to a rogue class feature. The race trades any hope of an extended day to be really o.k at stealth. A pixie rogue will out-sneak a shade any day of the week. People were upset because it was utterly stupid and bad design, not because of some sort of slavish devotion to combat.</p><p></p><p>As for structuring adventures around things other than a string of combat encounters, if you can't do it, then your not trying too awful hard. The last adventure I ran was some exploration, a bit of in-depth roleplay, and a single combat that consisted less of trying to beat the enemy, more getting away from them. The party was basically going up against 12 level 26 elites and a level 30 Solo with another level 30 Solo backing them up. Winning was not an option. Extra points because the other level 30 Solo was supposed to beat them up before the second one showed up with the small army, and instead they handled the situation well enough to keep that from happening, forcing the second Solo to attack them at full strength. Another example was the party was trying to simultaneously save an ally from execution and raise a city in rebellion. Saving the ally was the matter of a battle, but preparing for the operation involved a string of skill challenges. If they had failed those, even if they had saved their friend then either their soldiers or the people of the city would have been slaughtered in the operation. They would have won the battle, but at the cost of the war. Even earlier there was an episode involving a complex skill challenge getting dirt on, and negotiating with Drow Matrons with only a token combat. Make the adventure about accomplishing a goal (getting out alive, saving a city, making allies), instead of beating enemies, and you'll find the need to run 4-5 encounters of scaling difficulty to be far less pressing. Death is not the only price for failure. Really, the string of combats thing is more indicative of a DM's laziness or game style than a problem with the system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nyronus, post: 5709840, member: 93419"] Um, the reason there were "howls of nerdrage" was because the penalty was RETARDEDLY HARSH, while the benefit was nothing but. It was giving up half your turn to gain very limited access to a rogue class feature. The race trades any hope of an extended day to be really o.k at stealth. A pixie rogue will out-sneak a shade any day of the week. People were upset because it was utterly stupid and bad design, not because of some sort of slavish devotion to combat. As for structuring adventures around things other than a string of combat encounters, if you can't do it, then your not trying too awful hard. The last adventure I ran was some exploration, a bit of in-depth roleplay, and a single combat that consisted less of trying to beat the enemy, more getting away from them. The party was basically going up against 12 level 26 elites and a level 30 Solo with another level 30 Solo backing them up. Winning was not an option. Extra points because the other level 30 Solo was supposed to beat them up before the second one showed up with the small army, and instead they handled the situation well enough to keep that from happening, forcing the second Solo to attack them at full strength. Another example was the party was trying to simultaneously save an ally from execution and raise a city in rebellion. Saving the ally was the matter of a battle, but preparing for the operation involved a string of skill challenges. If they had failed those, even if they had saved their friend then either their soldiers or the people of the city would have been slaughtered in the operation. They would have won the battle, but at the cost of the war. Even earlier there was an episode involving a complex skill challenge getting dirt on, and negotiating with Drow Matrons with only a token combat. Make the adventure about accomplishing a goal (getting out alive, saving a city, making allies), instead of beating enemies, and you'll find the need to run 4-5 encounters of scaling difficulty to be far less pressing. Death is not the only price for failure. Really, the string of combats thing is more indicative of a DM's laziness or game style than a problem with the system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Legends and Lore: Preserving the Past
Top