Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Legends and Lore - The Temperature of the Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LurkAway" data-source="post: 5747020" data-attributes="member: 6685059"><p>I understand what you mean, and I was attempting to do is my explain my opinion that it changes for me when you open up from a skillset like "combat" to a much broader "adventuring". Like any stereotype, the broader/simpler the abstraction, the more vulnerable to scrutiny. At some point, it breaks for someone somewhere.</p><p></p><p>For one person, maybe the breaking limit is when PCs become better at skill checks outside the adventuring sphere. For a gritty player, maybe it's the wizard who is always hanging at the back and pew-pew-ing magic from a distance, and therefore shouldn't gain base attack bonuses to melee. For a deep immersionist, it's the PC who put 5 skill points into Climbing halfway throught the adventure but didn't actually do any climbing. (I'm just using these as theoretical examples that you can't please everyone, not as examples of what I think are the most endemic issues).</p><p></p><p>If we're going with the scrawny wizard archetype and not Gandalf with a sword, then I picture the scrawny wizard as being powered by uber-magic, but underneath that magic, he's still an ordinary man, particularily with Conan sword-and-sorcery fiction.</p><p></p><p>If he gets into heaven with Heracles, there perhaps he is a mere mortal but still capable of incredible magic, like a sci-fi soldier in a a supersuit and plasma weapons. Or he made it into the heavens by undergoing some sort of arcane apotheosis, becoming 'one' with his magic. I'm not sure -- I haven't thought that far.</p><p></p><p>If what concerns you is that a simulationist game breaks at Epic level (or even Paragon level), the "Lore" edition can have a toggle on the maximum PC level, like E6 does.</p><p></p><p>So for yourself, and please correct me if I'm wrong, the breaking limit of simulation for you is a middle-ground between gonzo-super-heroic fantasy and gritty fantasy, is that correct? That it is incoherent because it tries unsuccessfully to merge gritty and gonzo?</p><p></p><p>Yet 3E/PF is considered a simulationist game by many. I know you don't. Myself, I am ambivalent on that. So we know simulationism is very subjective.</p><p></p><p>Thus recognizing that simulationism is so inherently subjective, I think a simulationist system might a) choose a specific fiction from which to build the rules, or b) have toggles to allow the group to set the fiction they consider to be simulationist and immersive and provide the appropriate tools.</p><p></p><p>If you choose (a), then clearly, the problem is not that everyone likes the same fiction (whatever drove people from 1E or 2E or 3E). But the entire foundation of the game is built on that narrative, so you either have to tolerate it or play another game. And even if the narrative is extremely compelling (say, a Game of Thrones RPG), it may be too narrow to have mainstream appeal.</p><p></p><p>But if you choose (b), you have to have an elegant system for adjusting the rules, which makes Mearls and Monte's articles so pertinent for me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LurkAway, post: 5747020, member: 6685059"] I understand what you mean, and I was attempting to do is my explain my opinion that it changes for me when you open up from a skillset like "combat" to a much broader "adventuring". Like any stereotype, the broader/simpler the abstraction, the more vulnerable to scrutiny. At some point, it breaks for someone somewhere. For one person, maybe the breaking limit is when PCs become better at skill checks outside the adventuring sphere. For a gritty player, maybe it's the wizard who is always hanging at the back and pew-pew-ing magic from a distance, and therefore shouldn't gain base attack bonuses to melee. For a deep immersionist, it's the PC who put 5 skill points into Climbing halfway throught the adventure but didn't actually do any climbing. (I'm just using these as theoretical examples that you can't please everyone, not as examples of what I think are the most endemic issues). If we're going with the scrawny wizard archetype and not Gandalf with a sword, then I picture the scrawny wizard as being powered by uber-magic, but underneath that magic, he's still an ordinary man, particularily with Conan sword-and-sorcery fiction. If he gets into heaven with Heracles, there perhaps he is a mere mortal but still capable of incredible magic, like a sci-fi soldier in a a supersuit and plasma weapons. Or he made it into the heavens by undergoing some sort of arcane apotheosis, becoming 'one' with his magic. I'm not sure -- I haven't thought that far. If what concerns you is that a simulationist game breaks at Epic level (or even Paragon level), the "Lore" edition can have a toggle on the maximum PC level, like E6 does. So for yourself, and please correct me if I'm wrong, the breaking limit of simulation for you is a middle-ground between gonzo-super-heroic fantasy and gritty fantasy, is that correct? That it is incoherent because it tries unsuccessfully to merge gritty and gonzo? Yet 3E/PF is considered a simulationist game by many. I know you don't. Myself, I am ambivalent on that. So we know simulationism is very subjective. Thus recognizing that simulationism is so inherently subjective, I think a simulationist system might a) choose a specific fiction from which to build the rules, or b) have toggles to allow the group to set the fiction they consider to be simulationist and immersive and provide the appropriate tools. If you choose (a), then clearly, the problem is not that everyone likes the same fiction (whatever drove people from 1E or 2E or 3E). But the entire foundation of the game is built on that narrative, so you either have to tolerate it or play another game. And even if the narrative is extremely compelling (say, a Game of Thrones RPG), it may be too narrow to have mainstream appeal. But if you choose (b), you have to have an elegant system for adjusting the rules, which makes Mearls and Monte's articles so pertinent for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Legends and Lore - The Temperature of the Rules
Top