Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Legends and Lore - The Temperature of the Rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 5747404" data-attributes="member: 54877"><p>First, I'm not sure that you are using the same definition of "sandbox" that pemerton and I are using (or even that pemerton and I are 100% in sync, either). So maybe we'd better clear that up. For me, a pure sandbox is one in which there are defined limits (scope of the world, character power levels, what magic and can't do, and any number of such things, though not all of them in any given world necessarily)--that is, the "box". Then you have the elements that are in the box (mainly, characters, NPCs, monsters, locations, items)--that is, the "sand". The characters go an interact with those other elements inside the box, and the DM referees. </p><p> </p><p>For a pure sandbox, there is no preplotted action whatsoever. (The DM may have notes about goals and motivations, and things NPCs will do if not interfered with, but as a purist referee, these are are tentative.) More commonly, you'll get a less pure version where some of those major events are allowed to roll along (albeit somewhat modified if the players interfere) in order to keep the action moving. (I have seldom run a pure version, but I've come fairly close a few times.)</p><p> </p><p>That says nothing about styles. I've run almost pure hack and slash sandbox. I've run a mostly purist simulation exploration sandbox. I've run character-based exploration with the sandbox as background. And right now, I'm running a strange cross between a narrative, character-focused sandbox and a straight gamist, dungeon crawl sandbox. If internet reports can be trusted, there are a few other possibly sandbox styles, too. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p> </p><p>Your reservations about levels are one of the classic responses from someone who wants D&D as pretend simulation. (For clarity, there is no judgment being made here about that style, though I don't favor it personally. If the "pretend" adjective is too much, I'm open to another.) It is in contrast to someone like me or pemerton, who when we play simulation, want to move to a game that overtly supports that style, like Runequest. I like rules with a clear style in the mechanics, even though I often like games to be played in a muddle. It is easier for me to drift from a known point. Apparently, a lot of people like games with a muddled style in the mechanics, which they can then tweak this or that to get where they want.</p><p> </p><p>So yes, one of the ways to make the pretend simulation crowd happy is to remove some of the power from levels, but keep the heart of adventuring in levels. If they wanted the <strong>adventuring</strong> removed from the levels, then they would be one of those first two groups I mentioned earlier that play D&D but don't like it being D&D. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> But you can take out a certain amount of the peripheral stuff and still make something that is recognizable as D&D. There is, for example, no <strong>inherent</strong> reason why skills or ability scores need to scale with class level. If they don't, many things that the pretend simulation crowd wants will be easy to achieve (e.g. wizards with no particular ability towards opening doors).</p><p> </p><p>However, let's not go to far and assume that you can stop there. Pretend simulation may be a sizable portion of D&D, but it is not all of it, and I doubt even a majority. So whatever means are chosen, there had better also be a way to support people who want their wizards broadly competent by the time they are 10th level wizards--and it had better work mechanically, too (unlock 3E skill ranks, in this respect). A narrowing of the scaling of DCs is the most obvious way to satisfy both groups, and I doubt a better one (i.e. one with less nasty side effects) can be discovered.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 5747404, member: 54877"] First, I'm not sure that you are using the same definition of "sandbox" that pemerton and I are using (or even that pemerton and I are 100% in sync, either). So maybe we'd better clear that up. For me, a pure sandbox is one in which there are defined limits (scope of the world, character power levels, what magic and can't do, and any number of such things, though not all of them in any given world necessarily)--that is, the "box". Then you have the elements that are in the box (mainly, characters, NPCs, monsters, locations, items)--that is, the "sand". The characters go an interact with those other elements inside the box, and the DM referees. For a pure sandbox, there is no preplotted action whatsoever. (The DM may have notes about goals and motivations, and things NPCs will do if not interfered with, but as a purist referee, these are are tentative.) More commonly, you'll get a less pure version where some of those major events are allowed to roll along (albeit somewhat modified if the players interfere) in order to keep the action moving. (I have seldom run a pure version, but I've come fairly close a few times.) That says nothing about styles. I've run almost pure hack and slash sandbox. I've run a mostly purist simulation exploration sandbox. I've run character-based exploration with the sandbox as background. And right now, I'm running a strange cross between a narrative, character-focused sandbox and a straight gamist, dungeon crawl sandbox. If internet reports can be trusted, there are a few other possibly sandbox styles, too. :D Your reservations about levels are one of the classic responses from someone who wants D&D as pretend simulation. (For clarity, there is no judgment being made here about that style, though I don't favor it personally. If the "pretend" adjective is too much, I'm open to another.) It is in contrast to someone like me or pemerton, who when we play simulation, want to move to a game that overtly supports that style, like Runequest. I like rules with a clear style in the mechanics, even though I often like games to be played in a muddle. It is easier for me to drift from a known point. Apparently, a lot of people like games with a muddled style in the mechanics, which they can then tweak this or that to get where they want. So yes, one of the ways to make the pretend simulation crowd happy is to remove some of the power from levels, but keep the heart of adventuring in levels. If they wanted the [B]adventuring[/B] removed from the levels, then they would be one of those first two groups I mentioned earlier that play D&D but don't like it being D&D. :D But you can take out a certain amount of the peripheral stuff and still make something that is recognizable as D&D. There is, for example, no [B]inherent[/B] reason why skills or ability scores need to scale with class level. If they don't, many things that the pretend simulation crowd wants will be easy to achieve (e.g. wizards with no particular ability towards opening doors). However, let's not go to far and assume that you can stop there. Pretend simulation may be a sizable portion of D&D, but it is not all of it, and I doubt even a majority. So whatever means are chosen, there had better also be a way to support people who want their wizards broadly competent by the time they are 10th level wizards--and it had better work mechanically, too (unlock 3E skill ranks, in this respect). A narrowing of the scaling of DCs is the most obvious way to satisfy both groups, and I doubt a better one (i.e. one with less nasty side effects) can be discovered. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Legends and Lore - The Temperature of the Rules
Top