Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legends and Lore: Uber Feats eat Prestige classes and Paragon Paths or give +1 to ability
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 6118230" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>The article is hilarious... I have strong negative opinion on everything, worst L&L article ever! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>Many people hate feats (not me) so what do we get? Feats are now totally mandatory. Consider that since the start until the second-last playtest packet, feats were totally optional, so this is going clearly backwards.</p><p></p><p>Then +1 to ability scores right... as if between generous ability score generation (4d6 drop lowest) + racial ability score bonuses + class ability score bonuses + double increase every 4 levels... apparently we didn't have enough!</p><p></p><p>The whole 5e game is built around abilities being more important than level-based bonuses due to bounded accuracy, why giving them away so easily? Now pretty much <strong>every single 1st level PC</strong> is guaranteed to have at least 18 in her primary score. In a way this feels like it will become mandatory... be prepared to see every mid-level Fighter have Str 20, every mid-level Wizard have Int 20 and so on.</p><p></p><p>Also I can't believe that Mearls is <strong>so </strong>overlooking the reason why his Sorcerer friend couldn't find a feat. That clearly was <em>not</em> because of the feat mechanics but simply because <em>there were no feats in core 3e interesting enough for Sorcerers</em>. IOW, core 3e did not have enough feats. I know that people complain that there were too many feats in 3e, and too many of them were garbage or broken, but that was only after you factor in dozens of supplements. The <strong>core</strong> 3e had too many combat feats, and too few non-combat feats.</p><p></p><p>Even the part on prestige classes as feats leave me skeptic... it could work, but they will certainly be tempted at writing a purely sequential feat chain instead of a pool of feats and feat tree, which would be more interesting and will (finally!) make more prestige classes be worth to widely different classes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 6118230, member: 1465"] The article is hilarious... I have strong negative opinion on everything, worst L&L article ever! :D Many people hate feats (not me) so what do we get? Feats are now totally mandatory. Consider that since the start until the second-last playtest packet, feats were totally optional, so this is going clearly backwards. Then +1 to ability scores right... as if between generous ability score generation (4d6 drop lowest) + racial ability score bonuses + class ability score bonuses + double increase every 4 levels... apparently we didn't have enough! The whole 5e game is built around abilities being more important than level-based bonuses due to bounded accuracy, why giving them away so easily? Now pretty much [B]every single 1st level PC[/B] is guaranteed to have at least 18 in her primary score. In a way this feels like it will become mandatory... be prepared to see every mid-level Fighter have Str 20, every mid-level Wizard have Int 20 and so on. Also I can't believe that Mearls is [B]so [/B]overlooking the reason why his Sorcerer friend couldn't find a feat. That clearly was [I]not[/I] because of the feat mechanics but simply because [I]there were no feats in core 3e interesting enough for Sorcerers[/I]. IOW, core 3e did not have enough feats. I know that people complain that there were too many feats in 3e, and too many of them were garbage or broken, but that was only after you factor in dozens of supplements. The [B]core[/B] 3e had too many combat feats, and too few non-combat feats. Even the part on prestige classes as feats leave me skeptic... it could work, but they will certainly be tempted at writing a purely sequential feat chain instead of a pool of feats and feat tree, which would be more interesting and will (finally!) make more prestige classes be worth to widely different classes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legends and Lore: Uber Feats eat Prestige classes and Paragon Paths or give +1 to ability
Top