Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legends & Lore 03.10.2014: Full-spellcasting Bard
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 6274307" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>I'm not seeing how full caster ruins the bard archetype. </p><p></p><p>The bard in 3e was weak. They had the problem of sorcerers, but worse. Slow spell progression, limited spell slots which played havoc on balancing spell levels. (More on that in a moment) And they got little to trade in for; a few buff-songs and counter-songs, light armor, more skill points, and a few extra weapon proficiencies. (And a rogue's HD/Bab, so they were miserable combatants that lacked a rogue's SA spike damage). They needed some work. </p><p></p><p>The biggest advantage moving a bard up to full caster does is allow their spells to scale properly. For example, a bard in 3e got summon monster spells (which fits thematically). However, they lagged behind in spell slot acquisition so badly that most of the time, when you got a new SM spell, it was woefully outdated (Summon monster IV came at 10th level, the same point clerics and wizards got V. At 16th level, they gained access to the same monsters a cleric had at 11th). This was similarly true of illusions, charms, and healing spells; they didn't even do their magical shtick as well as the core casters. Moving them to full caster puts them on par with a cleric now. They will get access to healing at the same rate, can use charms, illusions and summons like a full caster, allowing someone to probably play one as a replacement for a cleric or druid (yay!) rather than a second-rate caster. </p><p></p><p>In fact, comparing them to a CoD might be an apt metaphor: full casting to keep their magical abilities scaling, a bit of weapon/armor use (since their magic isn't going to be combat-based), and some funky powers (inspiration, skills) to equal domains/wild shape.</p><p></p><p>I mean really, who EVER complained the bard was "too powerful"? Full casting is probably a simple fix that would do a lot to making them on par with the divine duo (which seems to be the new role they are going to play; a nod to the 4e Bard/leader).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 6274307, member: 7635"] I'm not seeing how full caster ruins the bard archetype. The bard in 3e was weak. They had the problem of sorcerers, but worse. Slow spell progression, limited spell slots which played havoc on balancing spell levels. (More on that in a moment) And they got little to trade in for; a few buff-songs and counter-songs, light armor, more skill points, and a few extra weapon proficiencies. (And a rogue's HD/Bab, so they were miserable combatants that lacked a rogue's SA spike damage). They needed some work. The biggest advantage moving a bard up to full caster does is allow their spells to scale properly. For example, a bard in 3e got summon monster spells (which fits thematically). However, they lagged behind in spell slot acquisition so badly that most of the time, when you got a new SM spell, it was woefully outdated (Summon monster IV came at 10th level, the same point clerics and wizards got V. At 16th level, they gained access to the same monsters a cleric had at 11th). This was similarly true of illusions, charms, and healing spells; they didn't even do their magical shtick as well as the core casters. Moving them to full caster puts them on par with a cleric now. They will get access to healing at the same rate, can use charms, illusions and summons like a full caster, allowing someone to probably play one as a replacement for a cleric or druid (yay!) rather than a second-rate caster. In fact, comparing them to a CoD might be an apt metaphor: full casting to keep their magical abilities scaling, a bit of weapon/armor use (since their magic isn't going to be combat-based), and some funky powers (inspiration, skills) to equal domains/wild shape. I mean really, who EVER complained the bard was "too powerful"? Full casting is probably a simple fix that would do a lot to making them on par with the divine duo (which seems to be the new role they are going to play; a nod to the 4e Bard/leader). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legends & Lore 03.10.2014: Full-spellcasting Bard
Top