Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legends & Lore: Clas Groups
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 6193135" data-attributes="member: 92511"><p>I'm just struck be the distinct and very obvious omission of ANY reference to psionics.</p><p></p><p>My understanding, certainly from the threads on this forum, that the psions being tucked under the "Mage Umbrella" [tm] was the largest cause of uproar and negative reaction. Sorcerers and Warlocks being there...ruffled some feathers, sure...but I didn't see the outrage of immersion breakage about those two. They both use arcane magic. *Poof* They go under Mage, easy peasy. The Psionics are the ones that had everyone tilting their heads sayin' "Whuuuuuh?"</p><p></p><p>Unless they intend...to place sorcerer and/or warlock under "Trickster" offering it higher HD, lesser armor and more-than-mages-but-still-few/light/simple weapons. They are Tricksters who use magic along iwth whatever is dtermined to be their "expert skills." This may have something to do with the title choice of "Trickster" vs. "Rogue" or "Expert" in the first place -which I agree is horrendous and needs changing back to the 2e titles (Which incidentally, @<em><strong><u><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=52734" target="_blank">Stormonu</a></u></strong></em> , did include "Wizard" as a group, not "Arcanist". jus' sayin').</p><p></p><p>As for a Monk being a priest, I can totally get behind that. However, both D&D tradition and the very flatly stated criteria for inclusion of their proposed class groups, it would seem the Monk does belong under "Rogue" (for their array of non-magical skill) or Warrior (for their primary function/defining trait as "unarmed combat guy").</p><p></p><p>To make them a Priest class would require a fairly complete overhaul/refocusing of their traditional D&D fluff...and crunch, as they currently have Priests defined as "masters of divine magic." So to do that, you need to make the Monk all about channeling divine energies and/or actually casting spells for their powers...or saying their uncanny physical prowess and "mystical" skills are the result of some achieved (or innate) direct divine connection...but then, isn't that what Clerics have? Change the fluff of both to make a Cleric's (and Paladin) one chosen/imbued by the gods, while a Monk's connection is sought after/achieved by the monk them self...the deity is not looking to help you, you are not one of their chosen...but they eventually notice you and throw you a few scraps/tidbits of divine power for your trouble/devotion.</p><p></p><p>I have no problem with rewriting the Monk's fluff (it probably could have benefited from it at least 3 editions ago), I just don't see it happening.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 6193135, member: 92511"] I'm just struck be the distinct and very obvious omission of ANY reference to psionics. My understanding, certainly from the threads on this forum, that the psions being tucked under the "Mage Umbrella" [tm] was the largest cause of uproar and negative reaction. Sorcerers and Warlocks being there...ruffled some feathers, sure...but I didn't see the outrage of immersion breakage about those two. They both use arcane magic. *Poof* They go under Mage, easy peasy. The Psionics are the ones that had everyone tilting their heads sayin' "Whuuuuuh?" Unless they intend...to place sorcerer and/or warlock under "Trickster" offering it higher HD, lesser armor and more-than-mages-but-still-few/light/simple weapons. They are Tricksters who use magic along iwth whatever is dtermined to be their "expert skills." This may have something to do with the title choice of "Trickster" vs. "Rogue" or "Expert" in the first place -which I agree is horrendous and needs changing back to the 2e titles (Which incidentally, @[I][B][U][URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/member.php?u=52734"]Stormonu[/URL][/U][/B][/I] , did include "Wizard" as a group, not "Arcanist". jus' sayin'). As for a Monk being a priest, I can totally get behind that. However, both D&D tradition and the very flatly stated criteria for inclusion of their proposed class groups, it would seem the Monk does belong under "Rogue" (for their array of non-magical skill) or Warrior (for their primary function/defining trait as "unarmed combat guy"). To make them a Priest class would require a fairly complete overhaul/refocusing of their traditional D&D fluff...and crunch, as they currently have Priests defined as "masters of divine magic." So to do that, you need to make the Monk all about channeling divine energies and/or actually casting spells for their powers...or saying their uncanny physical prowess and "mystical" skills are the result of some achieved (or innate) direct divine connection...but then, isn't that what Clerics have? Change the fluff of both to make a Cleric's (and Paladin) one chosen/imbued by the gods, while a Monk's connection is sought after/achieved by the monk them self...the deity is not looking to help you, you are not one of their chosen...but they eventually notice you and throw you a few scraps/tidbits of divine power for your trouble/devotion. I have no problem with rewriting the Monk's fluff (it probably could have benefited from it at least 3 editions ago), I just don't see it happening. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legends & Lore: Clas Groups
Top