Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legends & Lore: Clas Groups
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6195498" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>A couple of pages to list ten words? They're either going to list all the items in the index, or not, and that doesn't change with this addition we're discussing. The only addition is ten words in the index, and ten words in the text itself. There are no pages. There isn't even an additional paragraph, aside from "these are not restricted to class, just tend to be associated with them" sentence. It will be alphabetical within each of those five sections. It's not that weird, it's been alphabetical by type of item (weapon, want, potion, etc..) or by body slot (feet, head, hands, etc..) in the prior editions, so simply listing it by character type (cleric, fighter, etc..) isn't that weird.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I said both, in the two prior posts, and then a third time in the one you're replying to. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Words. Ten words, and a single sentence.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's not pages (and yeesh, the message you were replying to said outright it's not pages), and I explained that we're talking about a concept that WOTC seems to think their survey respondents and playtesters like. Of course, it's not just for this organization of magic items, there are many other reasons people put forth, but I wanted to drill down on just one to demonstrate that, when push comes to shove, there might be something useful here in this concept.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You said "just use the online index, it's better". Which isn't using a book like a book, unless you're book is also a computer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And there are a lot of applications for this classification system beside just magic item organization. But I was focusing on one concept to finally nail you down on one of these points and quit dismissing the whole concept out of hand. We've made progress, you're not just <strong>mostly </strong>dismissing it. Maybe we can move on to one of the other points now too...like how "this class is new to you, but you know it's sort of similar to that other class you are already familiar with because it's also a type of Rogue" is useful for new players who start with a Basic boxed set.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6195498, member: 2525"] A couple of pages to list ten words? They're either going to list all the items in the index, or not, and that doesn't change with this addition we're discussing. The only addition is ten words in the index, and ten words in the text itself. There are no pages. There isn't even an additional paragraph, aside from "these are not restricted to class, just tend to be associated with them" sentence. It will be alphabetical within each of those five sections. It's not that weird, it's been alphabetical by type of item (weapon, want, potion, etc..) or by body slot (feet, head, hands, etc..) in the prior editions, so simply listing it by character type (cleric, fighter, etc..) isn't that weird. I said both, in the two prior posts, and then a third time in the one you're replying to. Words. Ten words, and a single sentence. It's not pages (and yeesh, the message you were replying to said outright it's not pages), and I explained that we're talking about a concept that WOTC seems to think their survey respondents and playtesters like. Of course, it's not just for this organization of magic items, there are many other reasons people put forth, but I wanted to drill down on just one to demonstrate that, when push comes to shove, there might be something useful here in this concept. You said "just use the online index, it's better". Which isn't using a book like a book, unless you're book is also a computer. And there are a lot of applications for this classification system beside just magic item organization. But I was focusing on one concept to finally nail you down on one of these points and quit dismissing the whole concept out of hand. We've made progress, you're not just [B]mostly [/B]dismissing it. Maybe we can move on to one of the other points now too...like how "this class is new to you, but you know it's sort of similar to that other class you are already familiar with because it's also a type of Rogue" is useful for new players who start with a Basic boxed set. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Legends & Lore: Clas Groups
Top