Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Vicente" data-source="post: 6128451" data-attributes="member: 5101">I like LoA a lot, and I have played 3 very good sessions, one of them with DnD players and another two with a group that loves trying new systems (and LoA was our way of testing FATE).My experience with the game:- The book organization is horrible.- There are too many stunts (and that's a pain, because some of my players can't read English and explaining them was miserable for me). This made character generation take longer than expected <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown    :("  data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />- Magic skills are a very good way of adding flavor to a character and they don't feel overpowered.- Combat is very fun, at least for us more fun than 4e, but most of the players I played with prefer very free-form combat systems and don't like deep tactical combat, so the concept of zones is concrete enough for their tastes.I also remember that with the second group, which had seven players, I struggled trying to remember all the aspects they had and offering compels. But I don't think that's a LoA problem, it's more a FATE issues combined with myself being a new GM for FATE and having too many players (the first group was only two players and it worked much better).Regards!</blockquote>