Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Less is More? Less books per setting equal more enjoyment?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Obryn" data-source="post: 4909552" data-attributes="member: 11821"><p>It will be many, many fewer words - and that's by design, not by accident. I don't think it's a useful experiment when the developers, you, and I all know the result ahead of time. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> DDI articles are <em>not </em>intended to provide equal support to what you'd get in a series of 5-6 hardcovers over the course of 4 years.</p><p></p><p></p><p>128 pages is nearly a full hardcover! (The Power books hover around 160.) 32 or 64 pages, maybe, but 128 is pretty big!</p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that's pretty optimistic. I'd think it's closer to 20%-30%, and would drop as it got more specific.</p><p></p><p>It's all a numbers game for WotC right now. Core supplements simply sell more books that setting-specific supplements. If you sell 20% as many setting-specific supplements as you do core supplements, but it takes 50% as much development time and money, it's a losing proposition in comparison. The math is pretty solid, based on the numbers WotC has shared on the topic. Simply put, core supplements are a wiser allocation of development time.</p><p></p><p>With that said, it would be awesome if someone could work out a licensing deal with WotC to provide more detailed supplements. Shipping this sort of thing out to a smaller press could make it work. It won't happen, unfortunately, but it would be nice.</p><p></p><p>-O</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Obryn, post: 4909552, member: 11821"] It will be many, many fewer words - and that's by design, not by accident. I don't think it's a useful experiment when the developers, you, and I all know the result ahead of time. :) DDI articles are [I]not [/I]intended to provide equal support to what you'd get in a series of 5-6 hardcovers over the course of 4 years. 128 pages is nearly a full hardcover! (The Power books hover around 160.) 32 or 64 pages, maybe, but 128 is pretty big! I think that's pretty optimistic. I'd think it's closer to 20%-30%, and would drop as it got more specific. It's all a numbers game for WotC right now. Core supplements simply sell more books that setting-specific supplements. If you sell 20% as many setting-specific supplements as you do core supplements, but it takes 50% as much development time and money, it's a losing proposition in comparison. The math is pretty solid, based on the numbers WotC has shared on the topic. Simply put, core supplements are a wiser allocation of development time. With that said, it would be awesome if someone could work out a licensing deal with WotC to provide more detailed supplements. Shipping this sort of thing out to a smaller press could make it work. It won't happen, unfortunately, but it would be nice. -O [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Less is More? Less books per setting equal more enjoyment?
Top