Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Less is More: Why You Can't Get What You Want in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9350661" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>So, given that the last few pages have managed to turn into my favorite topic ... ME ... I thought I would at least briefly interject to see if I could try and re-direct the thread back to the original topic.</p><p></p><p>This, and the post you responded to ( [USER=6801845]@Oofta[/USER] ) are both articulating a major issue with D&D releases, and something that I was discussing in the OP that I think speaks to the design philosophy of 5e that we've seen so far.</p><p></p><p>Without going too far into the weeds on the history of released, I think it is instructive to see that 5e is one of the longest-lived released of D&D that we've had, and certain the longest of the WoTC era. Moreover, the new 5e isn't a complete change as the ones before (3e-4e-5e) but is more akin to the 1e-2e transition- but maybe even less than that.</p><p></p><p>I think that one of the reasons for that is the comparative simplicity of the design, and because WoTC has been very hesitant to pump out more official crunch. To the extent that they do put out more official crunch, it is almost always tied into a specific setting. This has allowed it to continue and thrive without needing a hard reset. </p><p></p><p>In addition, the smaller number of choices in the core rules* continue to make it easier for new players to pick up, and the design philosophy (including bounded accuracy) means that while optimization is still something players can do, it's not like 3e where players would be punished for making "incorrect" choices with their characters. </p><p></p><p>*Again, this is a relative statement. D&D is not easy compared to many TTRPGs. But 5e is <em>relatively</em> easy compared to crunchier games, and to past editions, for many players.</p><p></p><p>The disadvantage with this is that, for people that really like the crunch, or like tons of options, you might find it lacking. Which is okay! Different people have different preferences. You can - (1) homebrew, (2) use 3PP, or (3) play a game that is more suited to your interests.</p><p></p><p>I would say that the choices made by the designers both make 5e an excellent game for the intended market, but also limit the design space for that group of people that really want advanced options. While there is a lot of great 3PP, IME there are limits to how diverse they can be given the underlying constraints in 5e.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9350661, member: 7023840"] So, given that the last few pages have managed to turn into my favorite topic ... ME ... I thought I would at least briefly interject to see if I could try and re-direct the thread back to the original topic. This, and the post you responded to ( [USER=6801845]@Oofta[/USER] ) are both articulating a major issue with D&D releases, and something that I was discussing in the OP that I think speaks to the design philosophy of 5e that we've seen so far. Without going too far into the weeds on the history of released, I think it is instructive to see that 5e is one of the longest-lived released of D&D that we've had, and certain the longest of the WoTC era. Moreover, the new 5e isn't a complete change as the ones before (3e-4e-5e) but is more akin to the 1e-2e transition- but maybe even less than that. I think that one of the reasons for that is the comparative simplicity of the design, and because WoTC has been very hesitant to pump out more official crunch. To the extent that they do put out more official crunch, it is almost always tied into a specific setting. This has allowed it to continue and thrive without needing a hard reset. In addition, the smaller number of choices in the core rules* continue to make it easier for new players to pick up, and the design philosophy (including bounded accuracy) means that while optimization is still something players can do, it's not like 3e where players would be punished for making "incorrect" choices with their characters. *Again, this is a relative statement. D&D is not easy compared to many TTRPGs. But 5e is [I]relatively[/I] easy compared to crunchier games, and to past editions, for many players. The disadvantage with this is that, for people that really like the crunch, or like tons of options, you might find it lacking. Which is okay! Different people have different preferences. You can - (1) homebrew, (2) use 3PP, or (3) play a game that is more suited to your interests. I would say that the choices made by the designers both make 5e an excellent game for the intended market, but also limit the design space for that group of people that really want advanced options. While there is a lot of great 3PP, IME there are limits to how diverse they can be given the underlying constraints in 5e. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Less is More: Why You Can't Get What You Want in D&D
Top