Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FrankTrollman" data-source="post: 1155162" data-attributes="member: 14225">OK, that's exactly the same as that part of Tenser's Transformation. Actually, it's worse because you can still transfer the spell to friends with spell storage devices and with a caster level based BAB characters could end up with a BAB much higher than their level. For that matter, it is relatively trivial to get an Orange Ioun Stone and achieve a BAB of +21 at pre-epic levels. That's a big no-no as well.Regardless - why should there be such a spell?Wizards already fly, shoot lightning bolts, unlock doors, unravel ancient curses, and turn people into frogs much better than Fighters hit things. Why should Wizards be able to swing a sword as well as a Fighter?The Fighter is already underpowered and overshadowed by Clerics who abuse this sort of thing - why should he have to play second fiddle to a Wizard as well?-Frank</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FrankTrollman, post: 1155162, member: 14225"] OK, that's exactly the same as that part of Tenser's Transformation. Actually, it's worse because you can still transfer the spell to friends with spell storage devices and with a caster level based BAB characters could end up with a BAB much higher than their level. For that matter, it is relatively trivial to get an Orange Ioun Stone and achieve a BAB of +21 at pre-epic levels. That's a big no-no as well. Regardless - why should there be such a spell? Wizards already fly, shoot lightning bolts, unlock doors, unravel ancient curses, and turn people into frogs much better than Fighters hit things. Why should Wizards be able to swing a sword as well as a Fighter? The Fighter is already underpowered and overshadowed by Clerics who abuse this sort of thing - why should he have to play second fiddle to a [i]Wizard[/i] as well? -Frank [/QUOTE]

Verification