Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gorrstagg" data-source="post: 4470557" data-attributes="member: 15863">--------------------------------------------------This was in there as a rules answer. But it is wrong. And I would of sent them an email to fix it but in their infinite wisdom they didn't include a link so we could send Stephen an email, letting him know of his rather blatant error.What error is that you say?Please open your Players Handbooks to page 268. Under the section titled Tracking your turn.It states, and I quote.So.. to the persons valid question. The answer is, they take the ongoing damage first. In order as that's the order this is put in. And then the regeneration kicks in. (Assuming they were at 1 hp or above, where as 0 or lower and regeneration turns off.)I just don't understand how articles like these get put up when all they had to do literally was run a search on the word regeneration. (I'm assuming the writer had access to the rpgnow pdf's.)I'm not trying to bag on these guys, but the answers are often right there, and when a rep from the company is riffing on a great article sure its easy to make a mistake. But if they've been playing D&D 4E for a while now, they should know this. As regeneration comes up in quite a few places, from fighters, to items.So could someone please shoot them an email, and let them know of their error. (I would but I'm tired of trying to navigate a website that looks like some kids in a romper room of early html design put together. Seriously.. unify the damn thing already and make it look professional. As well as being the professionals, they should be answering simple rules questions correctly to boot. Though again, I recognize the good vibes from the article in the first place, and this could be an easy mistake. But don't they have a QA department for rules answers that should vet all rules answers first before publication?)Sorry, off to work now.. was in a hurry.</blockquote>

Verification