Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Let Warlord be Warlord
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kettite" data-source="post: 3852581" data-attributes="member: 43548"><p>I believe that you are introducing meta-game concepts in-game by having references to class names connote any meaning in game beyond real world usage. So, accepting that statement, it would indeed be weird for a low-level warlord to state "I am a warlord." in game, because warlord is used in real life to connote a very powerful and skilled individual.</p><p></p><p>However, if you accept improper usage of such terms as "dungeon" to bear meanings they would not ordinarily have out of game, why not this?</p><p></p><p>Also, while there may be Thieves' Guilds in D&D games, there hasn't been a thief class in a couple editions. Does this mean that if a character stated in-game "I am Lidda, the thief.", that NPCs would have no idea what the character meant because that particular term doesn't connote what it used to in the rule-set? Would the character have to state "I am Lidda, the rogue." in order to communicate what she can do to listeners in-game?</p><p></p><p>To combine the two concepts in one example: Player A's character states in-game "I am going to the dungeon to adventure!" All in-game listeners would reply "That's an odd place to have an adventure, as a dungeon is a keep, the main tower of a castle which formed the final defensive position the garrison could retreat to when outer fortifications were overcome." This does not happen, because meta-game usage of the term "dungeon" has changed the use of the term in-game. So listeners understand a dungeon to refer to underground labyrinths containing various types of enemies and puzzles. Therefore, under the 4E ruleset, the term 'warlord' will no longer solely refer to a person with power who has de facto military control of a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority. It will in-game refer to whatever it is the warlord character class abilities connote.</p><p></p><p>I cannot believe that I devoted time and effort to constructing this counter-argument. Oh my sweet God, I am wasting my life.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kettite, post: 3852581, member: 43548"] I believe that you are introducing meta-game concepts in-game by having references to class names connote any meaning in game beyond real world usage. So, accepting that statement, it would indeed be weird for a low-level warlord to state "I am a warlord." in game, because warlord is used in real life to connote a very powerful and skilled individual. However, if you accept improper usage of such terms as "dungeon" to bear meanings they would not ordinarily have out of game, why not this? Also, while there may be Thieves' Guilds in D&D games, there hasn't been a thief class in a couple editions. Does this mean that if a character stated in-game "I am Lidda, the thief.", that NPCs would have no idea what the character meant because that particular term doesn't connote what it used to in the rule-set? Would the character have to state "I am Lidda, the rogue." in order to communicate what she can do to listeners in-game? To combine the two concepts in one example: Player A's character states in-game "I am going to the dungeon to adventure!" All in-game listeners would reply "That's an odd place to have an adventure, as a dungeon is a keep, the main tower of a castle which formed the final defensive position the garrison could retreat to when outer fortifications were overcome." This does not happen, because meta-game usage of the term "dungeon" has changed the use of the term in-game. So listeners understand a dungeon to refer to underground labyrinths containing various types of enemies and puzzles. Therefore, under the 4E ruleset, the term 'warlord' will no longer solely refer to a person with power who has de facto military control of a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority. It will in-game refer to whatever it is the warlord character class abilities connote. I cannot believe that I devoted time and effort to constructing this counter-argument. Oh my sweet God, I am wasting my life. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Let Warlord be Warlord
Top