Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Zardnaar" data-source="post: 7861854" data-attributes="member: 6716779">Psions had lt armor in 2E.I would keep it simple and focus on a single archetype. If you use the warlock we know the hexblade exists so we can use that as a psychic warrior.I wouldn't worry about soulknikes, wilders etc keep it simple. For the wilder you have the wild sorcerer as a template.If you get the 1 Psion archetype right first you can use it with things like multiclassing to duplicate psychic warriors. Fighter 1/psion xyz can be used.Warlocks modular as well, if anyone else complains they can just design the relevent powers and not invocations themselves.Saves con and int IMHO. Best save, worst save. Wouldn't worry about wisdom and charisma based variants yet. We don't really need any more charisma based classes anytime soon.&nbsp;I can copy and paste my warlord and make the changes so already gave that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Zardnaar, post: 7861854, member: 6716779"] Psions had lt armor in 2E. I would keep it simple and focus on a single archetype. If you use the warlock we know the hexblade exists so we can use that as a psychic warrior. I wouldn't worry about soulknikes, wilders etc keep it simple. For the wilder you have the wild sorcerer as a template. If you get the 1 Psion archetype right first you can use it with things like multiclassing to duplicate psychic warriors. Fighter 1/psion xyz can be used. Warlocks modular as well, if anyone else complains they can just design the relevent powers and not invocations themselves. Saves con and int IMHO. Best save, worst save. Wouldn't worry about wisdom and charisma based variants yet. We don't really need any more charisma based classes anytime soon. I can copy and paste my warlord and make the changes so already gave that. [/QUOTE]

Verification