Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Let's discuss the Apprentice Tier.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Falling Icicle" data-source="post: 6117774" data-attributes="member: 17077"><p>I think the apprentice tier should be part of a module. They say this is to help beginners, but that is something that has a one-time value per person, ever. Everyone else is just going to skip it and go right to level 3. Something that is avoided by the vast majority of players should, by definition, be a module. Besides, I find the notion that new players are too dumb to understand the very basic characters we have right now in Next to be extremely insulting to new players. The only two classes that have a modicum of complexity at 1st level right now are the Cleric and Rogue, and even then, I find it difficult to imagine how they could be overwhelming to anyone, IMO. If those classes are indeed too front-loaded, then they should just fix those two classes.</p><p></p><p>As for the argument that some people want "fantasy Vietnam" style super fragile low level characters, this isn't going to please them either, since the apprentice levels are designed to only last for one, maybe two play sessions. Besides, this is directly contradictory to the idea that apprentice levels are supposed to be designed for newer players. Having super fragile characters that can easily die is anything but friendly for new players! Further, if the apprentice tier is only supposed to last for one or two sessions, how can they say this is to help new characters learn and ease into their characters? They're just going to be leveling up almost immediately and have pretty much no time at all to get comfortable with the stuff they already had.</p><p></p><p>Finally, people say this will make multiclassing easier, because you won't get so much stuff from level 1 dipping. This is the only argument in favor of this apprentice tier idea that I think has any real merit. But still, they could accomplish the same goal in other ways, like giving multiclass characters different stuff at level 1 than single class characters get.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Falling Icicle, post: 6117774, member: 17077"] I think the apprentice tier should be part of a module. They say this is to help beginners, but that is something that has a one-time value per person, ever. Everyone else is just going to skip it and go right to level 3. Something that is avoided by the vast majority of players should, by definition, be a module. Besides, I find the notion that new players are too dumb to understand the very basic characters we have right now in Next to be extremely insulting to new players. The only two classes that have a modicum of complexity at 1st level right now are the Cleric and Rogue, and even then, I find it difficult to imagine how they could be overwhelming to anyone, IMO. If those classes are indeed too front-loaded, then they should just fix those two classes. As for the argument that some people want "fantasy Vietnam" style super fragile low level characters, this isn't going to please them either, since the apprentice levels are designed to only last for one, maybe two play sessions. Besides, this is directly contradictory to the idea that apprentice levels are supposed to be designed for newer players. Having super fragile characters that can easily die is anything but friendly for new players! Further, if the apprentice tier is only supposed to last for one or two sessions, how can they say this is to help new characters learn and ease into their characters? They're just going to be leveling up almost immediately and have pretty much no time at all to get comfortable with the stuff they already had. Finally, people say this will make multiclassing easier, because you won't get so much stuff from level 1 dipping. This is the only argument in favor of this apprentice tier idea that I think has any real merit. But still, they could accomplish the same goal in other ways, like giving multiclass characters different stuff at level 1 than single class characters get. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Let's discuss the Apprentice Tier.
Top