Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Let's discuss the Mystic v.3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Erechel" data-source="post: 7055851" data-attributes="member: 6784868"><p>In fact, I picked the disciplines at glance, as if I were a random, non optimized player. I have not a "build", only picked the ones that look interesting, as my stupid damage is pretty much covered by two disciplines (Brute Force and Bestial Form). Yes, I hate Adaptative Body. I've always said that. I hate it. The Focus mechanic is PROBLEMATIC, but I don't hate it, at least if it's limited in some way (like requiring a Short Rest to change it again); you wanted to discuss psychic focus only, ignoring everything else. The fact is that the Psychic focus is pretty much the best at-will that a character needs, and it's very easy to change it. Change it as a bonus action, but limit it to 1/short rest, and you will be actually talking about a balanced, and still useful, passive. You will be talking about options. Yes, it's easy to house rule it, but you wouldn't need to if it weren't broken. </p><p></p><p>It's easy also to limit some of the AB abilities; make the AB psychic eat only half rations, and hold its breath for twice as much time, and sleep half as much, and you still will have a great survival focus. And as someone said earlier, previous cheese don't justify future cheese. </p><p></p><p>The fact is that you need only a few disciplines to make a "Build" (I pretty much hate that word); and a stupid build is still pretty much powerful and abarcative. I've made a level 16th that way because it is an NPC based on an AD&D player character who played stupidly and random, wanting to punch everyone; and chose similar powers, but some of their former companions were super useful as dramatic villains, and other (a nasty Necromancer with very high stats) is a reluctant ally both to the actual party and the psion NPC. AS I said earlier, I've made a <em>subpar character</em> <strong>on purpose</strong>, to show how powerful and versatile it is even that way. If I could make something like that in a few minutes, someone who purposefully choose to "build" a powerful and versatile character could do it very quickly, and it will be very nasty.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Erechel, post: 7055851, member: 6784868"] In fact, I picked the disciplines at glance, as if I were a random, non optimized player. I have not a "build", only picked the ones that look interesting, as my stupid damage is pretty much covered by two disciplines (Brute Force and Bestial Form). Yes, I hate Adaptative Body. I've always said that. I hate it. The Focus mechanic is PROBLEMATIC, but I don't hate it, at least if it's limited in some way (like requiring a Short Rest to change it again); you wanted to discuss psychic focus only, ignoring everything else. The fact is that the Psychic focus is pretty much the best at-will that a character needs, and it's very easy to change it. Change it as a bonus action, but limit it to 1/short rest, and you will be actually talking about a balanced, and still useful, passive. You will be talking about options. Yes, it's easy to house rule it, but you wouldn't need to if it weren't broken. It's easy also to limit some of the AB abilities; make the AB psychic eat only half rations, and hold its breath for twice as much time, and sleep half as much, and you still will have a great survival focus. And as someone said earlier, previous cheese don't justify future cheese. The fact is that you need only a few disciplines to make a "Build" (I pretty much hate that word); and a stupid build is still pretty much powerful and abarcative. I've made a level 16th that way because it is an NPC based on an AD&D player character who played stupidly and random, wanting to punch everyone; and chose similar powers, but some of their former companions were super useful as dramatic villains, and other (a nasty Necromancer with very high stats) is a reluctant ally both to the actual party and the psion NPC. AS I said earlier, I've made a [I]subpar character[/I] [B]on purpose[/B], to show how powerful and versatile it is even that way. If I could make something like that in a few minutes, someone who purposefully choose to "build" a powerful and versatile character could do it very quickly, and it will be very nasty. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Let's discuss the Mystic v.3
Top