Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Let's Forget the Forgotten Realms
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackwind" data-source="post: 5788984" data-attributes="member: 1205"><p>I agree with Morrus, FWIW, but I believe the die has already been cast. After all, they've already hired some Chinese video game art studio for FR! I am really curious to see what that will look like... :/</p><p></p><p>I ran one campaign in the Realms, like others here, when the 3.0 Realms book came out. It was a great book! Probably the best-done setting book that TSR or WotC had ever made. And we had fun in that campaign, although it had absolutely nothing to do with the setting.</p><p></p><p>Dragonlance was my first D&D setting. When my friend A. introduced me to D&D back in 4th grade (age 9 or 10) he also introduced me to the original DL novels. After that, I went on to read pretty much every DL novel in print (1994, there were a lot by then) over the next year or so. But I could never play in DL. The official story always made it too hard for me to imagine playing in that setting. I have a similar resistance to playing a Dune game or a Middle Earth game or any other setting where there's already a strong storyline established.</p><p></p><p>Plus I like world-building, so I've always run homebrew for the most part. But I think Morrus is onto something when he suggests that Greyhawk would be the best default setting for 5E.</p><p></p><p>First of all, it's full of weird, old-school awesome! The place-names and character names are distinctively Gygaxian. The "name" wizards and their spells. The iconic adventure locations. The deities and their quirky mythologies. The very idiosyncratic cosmology. It all sets D&D apart from other fantasy games. </p><p></p><p>In a sense, no other setting is as D&D as Greyhawk. And by supporting Greyhawk, WotC would be sending a message to long-time fans saying "yes, we really are getting back to the roots of what this game is about."</p><p></p><p>EDIT: I should add that I actually know very little about Greyhawk. I'm not some grognard, I'm 27. </p><p></p><p>I also know that part of the reason a lot of fans are/were so dedicated to Paizo is because of their support of Greyhawk while they had Dragon and Dungeon. </p><p></p><p>Finally, Greyhawk ties in really well with both Planescape and Spelljammer! In a way that FR doesn't, because FR has a different cosmology sort of.</p><p></p><p>As for Eberron: I think it's a really well done setting, but it's too far from the standard, pseudo-medieval milieu of D&D to be the flagship setting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackwind, post: 5788984, member: 1205"] I agree with Morrus, FWIW, but I believe the die has already been cast. After all, they've already hired some Chinese video game art studio for FR! I am really curious to see what that will look like... :/ I ran one campaign in the Realms, like others here, when the 3.0 Realms book came out. It was a great book! Probably the best-done setting book that TSR or WotC had ever made. And we had fun in that campaign, although it had absolutely nothing to do with the setting. Dragonlance was my first D&D setting. When my friend A. introduced me to D&D back in 4th grade (age 9 or 10) he also introduced me to the original DL novels. After that, I went on to read pretty much every DL novel in print (1994, there were a lot by then) over the next year or so. But I could never play in DL. The official story always made it too hard for me to imagine playing in that setting. I have a similar resistance to playing a Dune game or a Middle Earth game or any other setting where there's already a strong storyline established. Plus I like world-building, so I've always run homebrew for the most part. But I think Morrus is onto something when he suggests that Greyhawk would be the best default setting for 5E. First of all, it's full of weird, old-school awesome! The place-names and character names are distinctively Gygaxian. The "name" wizards and their spells. The iconic adventure locations. The deities and their quirky mythologies. The very idiosyncratic cosmology. It all sets D&D apart from other fantasy games. In a sense, no other setting is as D&D as Greyhawk. And by supporting Greyhawk, WotC would be sending a message to long-time fans saying "yes, we really are getting back to the roots of what this game is about." EDIT: I should add that I actually know very little about Greyhawk. I'm not some grognard, I'm 27. I also know that part of the reason a lot of fans are/were so dedicated to Paizo is because of their support of Greyhawk while they had Dragon and Dungeon. Finally, Greyhawk ties in really well with both Planescape and Spelljammer! In a way that FR doesn't, because FR has a different cosmology sort of. As for Eberron: I think it's a really well done setting, but it's too far from the standard, pseudo-medieval milieu of D&D to be the flagship setting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Let's Forget the Forgotten Realms
Top