Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Let's rant! When house rules get stoopid...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5164533" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>???</p><p></p><p>House ruling that the Bo9S is not allowed is not only reasonable in my opinion, but the preferred ruling - since the Bo9S classes aren't balanced with classes from other material IMO. The only exception I would make would be for a campaign where only the Bo9S classes were allowed.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I agree with you that its bad rules that let NPCs do what PCs cannot, but if I understand you correctly its worse than that. Letting an NPC do things that a PC can't is potentially only a minor irritation, but letting one player break the house rules selectively is just simply bad DMing that has nothing to do with bad house rules.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This isn't necessarily bad, but its particular implementation could be terrible I agree. Personally, I have no problem with the conception of a huge creature falling down and crushing things, but good rules for it would be tricky. </p><p></p><p>1) The Creature would have to collapse in a fairly random direction. </p><p>2) The collapse would have to have no more chance of success than a normal attack, ergo it would have to involve an attack roll or reflex save.</p><p>3) The collapse damage would have to be appropriate to the level of damage expected for a falling weight, and in particular, would have to take into account that only a portion of the creatures weight would impact and be born by any one thing beneath it. Most of the weight of a collapsed frost giant would be born by the ground.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is just an example of someone letting their own moral values impinge too much on the alignment system of D&D. If you are personally a moral relativist, either you need to accept that the D&D world doesn't describe the world you believe really exists, or else you need to throw out alignments so that the D&D world can describe the world you believe exists. Try to make the generally morally absolute world of alignments fit into a morally relativistic viewpoint is doomed to failure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5164533, member: 4937"] ??? House ruling that the Bo9S is not allowed is not only reasonable in my opinion, but the preferred ruling - since the Bo9S classes aren't balanced with classes from other material IMO. The only exception I would make would be for a campaign where only the Bo9S classes were allowed. Personally, I agree with you that its bad rules that let NPCs do what PCs cannot, but if I understand you correctly its worse than that. Letting an NPC do things that a PC can't is potentially only a minor irritation, but letting one player break the house rules selectively is just simply bad DMing that has nothing to do with bad house rules. This isn't necessarily bad, but its particular implementation could be terrible I agree. Personally, I have no problem with the conception of a huge creature falling down and crushing things, but good rules for it would be tricky. 1) The Creature would have to collapse in a fairly random direction. 2) The collapse would have to have no more chance of success than a normal attack, ergo it would have to involve an attack roll or reflex save. 3) The collapse damage would have to be appropriate to the level of damage expected for a falling weight, and in particular, would have to take into account that only a portion of the creatures weight would impact and be born by any one thing beneath it. Most of the weight of a collapsed frost giant would be born by the ground. This is just an example of someone letting their own moral values impinge too much on the alignment system of D&D. If you are personally a moral relativist, either you need to accept that the D&D world doesn't describe the world you believe really exists, or else you need to throw out alignments so that the D&D world can describe the world you believe exists. Try to make the generally morally absolute world of alignments fit into a morally relativistic viewpoint is doomed to failure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Let's rant! When house rules get stoopid...
Top