Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Let's simplify a monster stat block!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yair" data-source="post: 3720184" data-attributes="member: 10913"><p>I don't see how you can reasonably reduce this statblock much. The entries are just useful. </p><p></p><p>Touch AC should be seperated from normal AC if armor is going to affect AC, and I think it will. The flat-footed condition is cool, IMO - you could replace it with a flat bonus, for example, but I think losing Dex has a very different feel and is more appropriate. So I don't see an improvement there.</p><p></p><p>Skill bonuses need to be there even if their calculation isn't - there's just no need for the DM to do this on his own each time. This includes the need for Ability Scores, else you need to list ALL the skills and their bonuses... (and Ability Scores are needed for other things, too).</p><p></p><p>Feats are tight little rule packages the DM can be assumed to be familiar with. I don't think it would be wise to take that away. It's easier on the DM for the entry to list "Penetrating Shot" as a feat than to have the monster have the special ability "Penetrating Shot", which he then needs to look up. That said, feats already incorporated into the stats (e.g. Skill Focus) need not be listed, feats that are complex to use are better avoided, and the number of feats the DM is assumed to remember should be kept small (still, the ones in the PH make a pretty minimal list...).</p><p></p><p>Init shouldn't be scrapped IMO. It adds a difference to characters. So it needs an entry.</p><p></p><p>Hit Dice aren't a bother. I list my monsters as, say, "HP: 21 (5 HD)" - that's not much of a bother. What needs to go is the details ("3d8+4+2d6+4") - that's something no one uses and takes up a lot of space.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Creature Type may be getting the axe. Perhaps replaced by "role", however.</p><p></p><p>Alignment may be ommitted if it has no mechanical significance.</p><p></p><p>Size might be redundant. It's already figured into the AC, the Space/Reach, the Grapple, and so on. What remains that isn't taking it into account? Still, I think it aids and doesn't take too much space on the sheet. </p><p></p><p>Immunity is a concept that should go away. But the effect would still be there, in the form of high Resistance or save bonuses. So you don't really gain much.</p><p></p><p>Base attack should be moved to below, not be in the main combat block, IMO. But it's still needed for the off-chance you'll need to use it in combat instead of the main entries (Grapple, and the creature's Ranged & Melee weapons).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yair, post: 3720184, member: 10913"] I don't see how you can reasonably reduce this statblock much. The entries are just useful. Touch AC should be seperated from normal AC if armor is going to affect AC, and I think it will. The flat-footed condition is cool, IMO - you could replace it with a flat bonus, for example, but I think losing Dex has a very different feel and is more appropriate. So I don't see an improvement there. Skill bonuses need to be there even if their calculation isn't - there's just no need for the DM to do this on his own each time. This includes the need for Ability Scores, else you need to list ALL the skills and their bonuses... (and Ability Scores are needed for other things, too). Feats are tight little rule packages the DM can be assumed to be familiar with. I don't think it would be wise to take that away. It's easier on the DM for the entry to list "Penetrating Shot" as a feat than to have the monster have the special ability "Penetrating Shot", which he then needs to look up. That said, feats already incorporated into the stats (e.g. Skill Focus) need not be listed, feats that are complex to use are better avoided, and the number of feats the DM is assumed to remember should be kept small (still, the ones in the PH make a pretty minimal list...). Init shouldn't be scrapped IMO. It adds a difference to characters. So it needs an entry. Hit Dice aren't a bother. I list my monsters as, say, "HP: 21 (5 HD)" - that's not much of a bother. What needs to go is the details ("3d8+4+2d6+4") - that's something no one uses and takes up a lot of space. Creature Type may be getting the axe. Perhaps replaced by "role", however. Alignment may be ommitted if it has no mechanical significance. Size might be redundant. It's already figured into the AC, the Space/Reach, the Grapple, and so on. What remains that isn't taking it into account? Still, I think it aids and doesn't take too much space on the sheet. Immunity is a concept that should go away. But the effect would still be there, in the form of high Resistance or save bonuses. So you don't really gain much. Base attack should be moved to below, not be in the main combat block, IMO. But it's still needed for the off-chance you'll need to use it in combat instead of the main entries (Grapple, and the creature's Ranged & Melee weapons). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Let's simplify a monster stat block!
Top