Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="W'rkncacnter" data-source="post: 9304350" data-attributes="member: 7033455">i probably wouldn't even have made this reply if it weren't for the last two statements i'm going to respond to here, but here goes......why not? like, do you have a reason? i'd be interested to hear it.i'm directly quoting the text. what are you even disagreeing with?because we made our posts before that example was posted? i mean, the post you're replying to here was literally the first post in this thread after you disagreed with the examples in question. hell, i replied to that example before you ever agreed with it (to point out it looked like a double image post).first off, if (generic) you say something that's just flat out wrong, i don't know why it'd be a bad thing to correct you on it. you said the savage ability was magical or supernatural. i pointed out that the text outright states it's neither. i guess if you were running a game where someone had that ability you could rule it as one or the other if you really wanted to, but then you'd be going against the text. i also didn't imply you viewing the samurai/ronin ability as magical was &quot;absurd&quot;. i said i thought it was a stretch, and explained why. that's not the same thing - i was disagreeing with you.second, you JUST accused me of &quot;beating [a dead] horse&quot; because of a post that hadn't been made at the time of my post. how are you going to criticize other people for bad behaviour when you are, at best, making accusations without taking the most basic steps to check if they even make sense?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="W'rkncacnter, post: 9304350, member: 7033455"] i probably wouldn't even have made this reply if it weren't for the last two statements i'm going to respond to here, but here goes... ...why not? like, do you have a reason? i'd be interested to hear it. i'm directly quoting the text. what are you even disagreeing with? because we made our posts before that example was posted? i mean, the post you're replying to here was literally the first post in this thread after you disagreed with the examples in question. hell, i replied to that example before you ever agreed with it (to point out it looked like a double image post). first off, if (generic) you say something that's just flat out wrong, i don't know why it'd be a bad thing to correct you on it. you said the savage ability was magical or supernatural. i pointed out that the text outright states it's neither. i guess if you were running a game where someone had that ability you could rule it as one or the other if you [I]really [/I]wanted to, but then you'd be going against the text. i also didn't imply you viewing the samurai/ronin ability as magical was "absurd". i said i thought it was a stretch, and explained why. that's not the same thing - i was disagreeing with you. second, you JUST accused me of "beating [a dead] horse" because of a post that hadn't been made at the time of my post. how are you going to criticize other people for bad behaviour when you are, at best, making accusations without taking the most basic steps to check if they even make sense? [/QUOTE]

Verification