Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Let's Talk About 4E On Its Own Terms [+]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 9304399" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Yes, I understand. I'm not trying to be pedantic about it. You cube the mass of things when you double their size. Actually though it is a bit more complex than that, since the square-cube law DOES come into play in terms of things like limb strength. This tells us that doubling the dimensions of a creature actually must increase it's mass MUCH MORE than squared, and closer to cubed. So I'm actually being kind of generous in my numbers. A 12' giant would actually need to weigh more like 3,000 or 4,000 pounds, and thus be more like 15x stronger than a human if it was to actually be able to move. The mass of elephants bears this out, though not being humanoid the extrapolations aren't as exact.</p><p></p><p>Yes, I understand all of this. There was a famous Dragon article way way back (I suppose someone could look up exactly which issue, I'm sure I have it) that went through ALL of this, called "How Heavy is My Giant?" but it is all just basic biomechanics. This is all why I say above that a 12' giant would ACTUALLY need to weigh something like 2x or 3x what a simple application of cubing (1200 lbs or so) would give you, because all its limbs, even its trunk, and its skeletal structure would have to be MUCH thicker proportionally than a human's.</p><p></p><p>Well, giant sauropods clearly had ways. I mean, gigantism of some type is clearly possible. It needn't be magical, though that would certainly make things comport more with folklore giants, which seem to be proportioned the same as humans mostly. Partly hollow bones, thicker limbs, special joint architecture, extra dense musculature, etc. These are all things that very large animals seem to do, at least on land. I think we can agree that bipedal creatures larger than, maybe at most, 12' are probably impossible in nature though. I mean, I don't think any serious research has been done on it, if someone told me 15' giants are possible, I won't argue the point. </p><p></p><p>In any case, any creature in this size scale, giant, dragon, whatever, is going to need strength of a level that is simply overwhelming in terms of human scale. In Kenya I saw elephants smash down huge trees. No person, modern weaponry excepted, is going to fight an elephant. Now give it some serious intellect, and weapons, you're just dead. I don't care how incredibly skilled you are, it will not matter. Anyone who can fight stuff like that is 'magical'.</p><p></p><p>I know the stubborn argument, that people can define 'magic' in some sort of game-technical way that makes fighters "non-magical" but any such sophistry also completely undermines the argument that they're bound by actual physical law! So my point stands, this is all fantastical and a rule that says "fantastical can only happen 2x per day" CANNOT be argued against on the basis of its realism or lack thereof! The argument itself is irrational at that point. I accept people's preferences, but even the Internet cannot defeat logic, only ignore it!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 9304399, member: 82106"] Yes, I understand. I'm not trying to be pedantic about it. You cube the mass of things when you double their size. Actually though it is a bit more complex than that, since the square-cube law DOES come into play in terms of things like limb strength. This tells us that doubling the dimensions of a creature actually must increase it's mass MUCH MORE than squared, and closer to cubed. So I'm actually being kind of generous in my numbers. A 12' giant would actually need to weigh more like 3,000 or 4,000 pounds, and thus be more like 15x stronger than a human if it was to actually be able to move. The mass of elephants bears this out, though not being humanoid the extrapolations aren't as exact. Yes, I understand all of this. There was a famous Dragon article way way back (I suppose someone could look up exactly which issue, I'm sure I have it) that went through ALL of this, called "How Heavy is My Giant?" but it is all just basic biomechanics. This is all why I say above that a 12' giant would ACTUALLY need to weigh something like 2x or 3x what a simple application of cubing (1200 lbs or so) would give you, because all its limbs, even its trunk, and its skeletal structure would have to be MUCH thicker proportionally than a human's. Well, giant sauropods clearly had ways. I mean, gigantism of some type is clearly possible. It needn't be magical, though that would certainly make things comport more with folklore giants, which seem to be proportioned the same as humans mostly. Partly hollow bones, thicker limbs, special joint architecture, extra dense musculature, etc. These are all things that very large animals seem to do, at least on land. I think we can agree that bipedal creatures larger than, maybe at most, 12' are probably impossible in nature though. I mean, I don't think any serious research has been done on it, if someone told me 15' giants are possible, I won't argue the point. In any case, any creature in this size scale, giant, dragon, whatever, is going to need strength of a level that is simply overwhelming in terms of human scale. In Kenya I saw elephants smash down huge trees. No person, modern weaponry excepted, is going to fight an elephant. Now give it some serious intellect, and weapons, you're just dead. I don't care how incredibly skilled you are, it will not matter. Anyone who can fight stuff like that is 'magical'. I know the stubborn argument, that people can define 'magic' in some sort of game-technical way that makes fighters "non-magical" but any such sophistry also completely undermines the argument that they're bound by actual physical law! So my point stands, this is all fantastical and a rule that says "fantastical can only happen 2x per day" CANNOT be argued against on the basis of its realism or lack thereof! The argument itself is irrational at that point. I accept people's preferences, but even the Internet cannot defeat logic, only ignore it! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Let's Talk About 4E On Its Own Terms [+]
Top