Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Psimancer" data-source="post: 1724125" data-attributes="member: 13037">Yeah, yeah, it was the quickly typed abridged version, with bonus errors! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />...which was my point...  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Thus giving away your presence and your best combat tactic; ambush… Why illuminate your target when the chances are they will be illuminating themselves with torches and lanterns… Funny that you say that, because when you are in the dark for a long time, you do start to see colours, just not the correct one! It’s to do with you brain going haywire…Agreed, another reason I want to run it like that… I guess I want a ‘crunch’ reason to do it, not just a ‘fluff’ one… I guess, at the end of the day, the 'no contrast' version adds more to the game than I feel that it takes away... but I guess we are moving into the realms of personal preference here...</blockquote>