Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Let's Talk About "Intended Playstyle"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aramis erak" data-source="post: 9871962" data-attributes="member: 6779310"><p>Not quite true...</p><p>But without artha, you trade off advancement for success. You can still succeed. Or you do things you know are too hard to succeed, fishing for the ones that the GM doesn't beat you soundly in the "if this fails" declaration, and accept a failure to get those challenging Advancement Marks. You can even slough extra dice from Help, FoRKs, Gear, prep, and other conditionals in order to let yourself be unable to succeed.</p><p></p><p>For those not fluent in BW... there are three categories of XP for each advanceable score: Routine tests, Difficult Tests, and Challenging Tests. For skills, Levels 1-4 require (Level) routine and (level/2⤴) difficult, but no challenging (but may sub a challenging for 2 difficults). Levels 5-9, you need (level/2⤴) difficult and about (level/3⤴) challenging, but routines no longer count.</p><p>Note that challenging requires a difficulty higher than the sum of all non-artha-provided dice thrown - in other words, cannot be successful. The Routine is difficulty up to about 3/4 the number of dice; challenging is the in between. Note that the formulae I used are descriptives; it's actually table driven.</p><p></p><p>And advancement requires tests with consequences, but does not require success at those tasks.</p><p>So, without artha, you can either succceed, or you can embrace failures to advance. I actually had a player do that in BE... they needed that challenging to make level 6 in a skill, one they desperately needed for a later action, so they decided to not use their FoRKs and reject help on that Ob6 test... they failed... it hurt... but they now had Persuasion 6. And it paid back that hurt.</p><p></p><p>More Lingo: FoRK = Field of Related Knowledge. If you have a useful skill for supporting your action, you can invoke it as a FoRK, and essentially self help gaining 1 (2 if you've godlike skill levels) die to the pool.</p><p>Help: you get a die from an ally helping. In FTF play, the rules require them to hand you one of their dice... preferably distinct from your own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aramis erak, post: 9871962, member: 6779310"] Not quite true... But without artha, you trade off advancement for success. You can still succeed. Or you do things you know are too hard to succeed, fishing for the ones that the GM doesn't beat you soundly in the "if this fails" declaration, and accept a failure to get those challenging Advancement Marks. You can even slough extra dice from Help, FoRKs, Gear, prep, and other conditionals in order to let yourself be unable to succeed. For those not fluent in BW... there are three categories of XP for each advanceable score: Routine tests, Difficult Tests, and Challenging Tests. For skills, Levels 1-4 require (Level) routine and (level/2⤴) difficult, but no challenging (but may sub a challenging for 2 difficults). Levels 5-9, you need (level/2⤴) difficult and about (level/3⤴) challenging, but routines no longer count. Note that challenging requires a difficulty higher than the sum of all non-artha-provided dice thrown - in other words, cannot be successful. The Routine is difficulty up to about 3/4 the number of dice; challenging is the in between. Note that the formulae I used are descriptives; it's actually table driven. And advancement requires tests with consequences, but does not require success at those tasks. So, without artha, you can either succceed, or you can embrace failures to advance. I actually had a player do that in BE... they needed that challenging to make level 6 in a skill, one they desperately needed for a later action, so they decided to not use their FoRKs and reject help on that Ob6 test... they failed... it hurt... but they now had Persuasion 6. And it paid back that hurt. More Lingo: FoRK = Field of Related Knowledge. If you have a useful skill for supporting your action, you can invoke it as a FoRK, and essentially self help gaining 1 (2 if you've godlike skill levels) die to the pool. Help: you get a die from an ally helping. In FTF play, the rules require them to hand you one of their dice... preferably distinct from your own. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Let's Talk About "Intended Playstyle"
Top