Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Let's talk whips...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest 6801328" data-source="post: 6866045"><p>Sure, but now you've either given up the character concept of weapon in one hand, whip in the other (because presumably you're swapping the whip for something else when you're within 5') or you're seriously gimping yourself by holding a useless item in the offhand.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>First, Finesse itself isn't an advantage. It's a mutually exclusive property with Versatile, and it doesn't actually grant any advantages (Except maybe that Rogues can use them for Sneak Attack.) And range is only an advantage very, very rarely. So, yeah, if you're proficient with martial weapons then maybe it makes sense to carry one on your belt for those edge cases, because they're lighter than Halberds.</p><p></p><p>But otherwise it's a pretty terrible weapon. You're giving up 2 points of damage per attack when compared to the alternatives. That's equivalent to the Dueling fighting style.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>TOTALLY agree. But that doesn't mean it isn't competing. Great Weapon Master and Sentinel compete with each other, in the sense that for a lot of builds they are both great feats and with one ASI you only get to pick one, but they are also great together.</p><p></p><p>Now, I'm not sure exactly how to make the same thing work with Whip Master, but that's my goal. Again, if Whips were simply "light" it would solve most of the problem.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, as noted above, I think we just disagree about that. How many whips are you actually seeing used as primary weapons? I've yet to see a single instance of it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Er, yes, I agree that's a problem. That's one reason I'm posting here...to see if anybody has any solutions to how to write it such that it's simple, fun, and useful, but not overly broad. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why is "logic" in quotes? Just snark?</p><p></p><p>Generally the more damaging weapons (pretty much anything in the martial list) is not a Monk Weapon because their damage is 1d8 or more. Part of the balance of the monk class is that they do less damage at lower levels and make up for it with multiple attacks. Then their base damage scales as they increase levels to keep pace with the damage boosts of other classes (scaling Sneak Attack, multiple Divine Smites, etc.). Most of the weapons that aren't currently Monk Weapons would do too much damage at lower levels, and mess up that balance. Since the whip only does 1d4 it wouldn't really affect balance if monks could use it. </p><p></p><p>So, no, the same "logic" doesn't apply to every weapon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 6801328, post: 6866045"] Sure, but now you've either given up the character concept of weapon in one hand, whip in the other (because presumably you're swapping the whip for something else when you're within 5') or you're seriously gimping yourself by holding a useless item in the offhand. First, Finesse itself isn't an advantage. It's a mutually exclusive property with Versatile, and it doesn't actually grant any advantages (Except maybe that Rogues can use them for Sneak Attack.) And range is only an advantage very, very rarely. So, yeah, if you're proficient with martial weapons then maybe it makes sense to carry one on your belt for those edge cases, because they're lighter than Halberds. But otherwise it's a pretty terrible weapon. You're giving up 2 points of damage per attack when compared to the alternatives. That's equivalent to the Dueling fighting style. TOTALLY agree. But that doesn't mean it isn't competing. Great Weapon Master and Sentinel compete with each other, in the sense that for a lot of builds they are both great feats and with one ASI you only get to pick one, but they are also great together. Now, I'm not sure exactly how to make the same thing work with Whip Master, but that's my goal. Again, if Whips were simply "light" it would solve most of the problem. Well, as noted above, I think we just disagree about that. How many whips are you actually seeing used as primary weapons? I've yet to see a single instance of it. Er, yes, I agree that's a problem. That's one reason I'm posting here...to see if anybody has any solutions to how to write it such that it's simple, fun, and useful, but not overly broad. Why is "logic" in quotes? Just snark? Generally the more damaging weapons (pretty much anything in the martial list) is not a Monk Weapon because their damage is 1d8 or more. Part of the balance of the monk class is that they do less damage at lower levels and make up for it with multiple attacks. Then their base damage scales as they increase levels to keep pace with the damage boosts of other classes (scaling Sneak Attack, multiple Divine Smites, etc.). Most of the weapons that aren't currently Monk Weapons would do too much damage at lower levels, and mess up that balance. Since the whip only does 1d4 it wouldn't really affect balance if monks could use it. So, no, the same "logic" doesn't apply to every weapon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Let's talk whips...
Top