Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Letting yourself be hit - by an ally ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thewok" data-source="post: 5690739" data-attributes="member: 60907"><p>I don't really think it's a question of the target. The flavor text is immaterial. The actual Target line says "One Creature." That's not the debate.</p><p></p><p>The question is "Can a target willingly get hit by a hostile power?" By RAW, I'd say no.</p><p></p><p>That said, let's look past RAW. This is certainly a very useful power, and it does have some very good utility when used on friendly targets. Looking at it, though, I believe that this power is pretty powerful when used on friendlies/ Say you have a cleric with a +4 charisma modifier. Right off, that's a seven-square slide. Since forced movement does not provoke OAs, you effectively have given someone a seven-square shift. Also, since forced movement is not affected by difficult terrain, you now have a seven-square shift that few things can really follow, making the daze a mere annoyance.</p><p></p><p>Now imagine a multiclassed sorcerer. That seven-square shift is now 11-12 squares at level 28. Even with the daze, that's a hell of an "Oh, s---!" power.</p><p></p><p>Then there's the cleric who might want to use this power on himself. He is a creature, after all, and a range of 0 is within the range of the spell.</p><p></p><p>As I said above, I'd say they need to hit the full defense in order to use the power.</p><p></p><p>Alternatively, I'd allow them to lower their defense as a free action--not against just the one attack, but until the end of their next turn. This isn't really a problem against stuff like kobolds and orcs, but against mind flayers and the like this can prove to be a very dangerous option, which might introduce some very interesting things to a game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thewok, post: 5690739, member: 60907"] I don't really think it's a question of the target. The flavor text is immaterial. The actual Target line says "One Creature." That's not the debate. The question is "Can a target willingly get hit by a hostile power?" By RAW, I'd say no. That said, let's look past RAW. This is certainly a very useful power, and it does have some very good utility when used on friendly targets. Looking at it, though, I believe that this power is pretty powerful when used on friendlies/ Say you have a cleric with a +4 charisma modifier. Right off, that's a seven-square slide. Since forced movement does not provoke OAs, you effectively have given someone a seven-square shift. Also, since forced movement is not affected by difficult terrain, you now have a seven-square shift that few things can really follow, making the daze a mere annoyance. Now imagine a multiclassed sorcerer. That seven-square shift is now 11-12 squares at level 28. Even with the daze, that's a hell of an "Oh, s---!" power. Then there's the cleric who might want to use this power on himself. He is a creature, after all, and a range of 0 is within the range of the spell. As I said above, I'd say they need to hit the full defense in order to use the power. Alternatively, I'd allow them to lower their defense as a free action--not against just the one attack, but until the end of their next turn. This isn't really a problem against stuff like kobolds and orcs, but against mind flayers and the like this can prove to be a very dangerous option, which might introduce some very interesting things to a game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Letting yourself be hit - by an ally ?
Top