Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 8159786" data-attributes="member: 6915329">All in all, definitely an interesting sneak peak and I can't wait to see examples!Adept: This looks like you've turned monk into a more generic hand-to-hand fighter and moved away from Asian-style martial arts. I like this--I ran a game where one of the players turned an Open Hand monk into a professional boxer--although I wonder if that'll annoy people who prefer their wuxia. If someone wanted to play, say, a Drunken Master, would that map to the Adept class? Or would you consider them to be separate enough classes that you wouldn't use a monk archetype with the Adept.Since you're potentially looking for new names, perhaps Olympian could become Hero?Cleric: I hope there will be a few more archetypes, for people who are servitors of other types of gods--or, other than Sun/Light, are you moving away from the Domains concept entirely?Fighter: Is Gladiator going to be a big, showy-type fighter, or is this a net-and-trident type? Herald: A replacement for paladins?Warlock: Aw, no Feylock? I'm intrigued by Spellbound, though.Wizard: Based on nothing but what I can extrapolate, Traditionalist sounds like a fine name. Since I assume this means you're studying one or more of the basic schools of magic (illusion, evocation, etc.), then you're casting traditional magic.That said, you've introduced so many new sub-schools, I'm interested in if you're going to have archetypes for some of them. If you have firemages, why not icemages and shadowmages!</blockquote>

Verification