Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 8110352" data-attributes="member: 93670">there are a few things wrong with that statement.  I've seen people say <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/level-up-playtest-document-4-druid.675603/post-8109012" target="_blank">their experience</a>, <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/level-up-playtest-document-4-druid.675603/post-8109096" target="_blank">mine included</a> was that the headache you claim doesn't exist.  Many enjoy the flexibility & don't find the "problem" you note to be a problem worth fixing any more than reducing spell choice for casters to simplify the wizard experience is something worth the effort to consider.The idea of linking exploration knacks to an even more limited wildshape is absurd because other classes aren't giving up things from the core class to make a space for their knacks to simply exist. The druid knacks are decidedly weaksauce due to fluff supported mechanical restrictions that in some case are on top of an ability already poor in other ways as many commented on.  Wildshape forms already have a min cr for both moon & non-moon druids based on a fraction of the druid level & weakening wildshape by taking away from it in order to give options to claw back some with knacks seems like an especially bad idea given how many comments mention how weak the druid seems absent other stuff that might be important but not yet ready.</blockquote>