Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
LG, sex and Star Trek
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hida Bukkorosu" data-source="post: 1116405" data-attributes="member: 7494"><p>here's how i would view things:</p><p></p><p>Lawful characters would tend to have sex only in commited relationships. Chaotic characters would be much more likely to have casual sex.</p><p></p><p>Good characters would be primarily interested in the other person's pleasure before thinking about their own, and Evil characters would do things like lie to get women into bed, use sex as a tool to control, use force (or, in a D&D world, magic) to obtain sex, etc.</p><p></p><p>So here's my view of the alignments:</p><p></p><p>LG: Sex only in long term FORMALLY commited relationships (which may be monogamous or polygamous, depending on the standards of their culture), and always looking out for the other person's desires above one's own. </p><p></p><p>LN: Pretty much same as LG, but more selfish with regards to how they treat the other person in the relationship. Looking out for self first, but not acting malicious toward the other person. </p><p></p><p>LE: These characters would tend to be in long term formal relationships, but within those relationships, they would be abusive, manipulative, controlling, etc.</p><p></p><p>NG: NG characters would be less insistent about formally commiting their relationships than LG characters, and may even have flings and one-night-stands in between relationships, but like LG characters, would be generally selfless about their sex lives.</p><p></p><p>N: N characters would have both relationships and flings, and would be primarily concerned with their own pleasure, but would be honest about that fact and not cross the line of actively hurting others to obtain that pleasure.</p><p></p><p>NE: NE characters are out to get laid, and don't care who they screw over to do it. NE characters will use lies, deceit, blackmail, etc. to get what they want.</p><p></p><p>CG: CG characters would tend towards "alternative" relationships such as polyamory, orgies, "open marriages", etc. They would tend to be much more spontaneous and moment focus, rarely looking for any sort of long term commitment, but also in all their relationships putting the other person's pleasure ahead of their own.</p><p></p><p>CN: CN characters would tend to the same type of relationships as CG characters, but are more self-centered in pursuing them. They also will tend to flaunt such relationships in society's face, in order to antagonize and needle lawful types.</p><p></p><p>CE: CE characters would include your rapists, pedophiles, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hida Bukkorosu, post: 1116405, member: 7494"] here's how i would view things: Lawful characters would tend to have sex only in commited relationships. Chaotic characters would be much more likely to have casual sex. Good characters would be primarily interested in the other person's pleasure before thinking about their own, and Evil characters would do things like lie to get women into bed, use sex as a tool to control, use force (or, in a D&D world, magic) to obtain sex, etc. So here's my view of the alignments: LG: Sex only in long term FORMALLY commited relationships (which may be monogamous or polygamous, depending on the standards of their culture), and always looking out for the other person's desires above one's own. LN: Pretty much same as LG, but more selfish with regards to how they treat the other person in the relationship. Looking out for self first, but not acting malicious toward the other person. LE: These characters would tend to be in long term formal relationships, but within those relationships, they would be abusive, manipulative, controlling, etc. NG: NG characters would be less insistent about formally commiting their relationships than LG characters, and may even have flings and one-night-stands in between relationships, but like LG characters, would be generally selfless about their sex lives. N: N characters would have both relationships and flings, and would be primarily concerned with their own pleasure, but would be honest about that fact and not cross the line of actively hurting others to obtain that pleasure. NE: NE characters are out to get laid, and don't care who they screw over to do it. NE characters will use lies, deceit, blackmail, etc. to get what they want. CG: CG characters would tend towards "alternative" relationships such as polyamory, orgies, "open marriages", etc. They would tend to be much more spontaneous and moment focus, rarely looking for any sort of long term commitment, but also in all their relationships putting the other person's pleasure ahead of their own. CN: CN characters would tend to the same type of relationships as CG characters, but are more self-centered in pursuing them. They also will tend to flaunt such relationships in society's face, in order to antagonize and needle lawful types. CE: CE characters would include your rapists, pedophiles, etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
LG, sex and Star Trek
Top