Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LuYangShih" data-source="post: 1121942" data-attributes="member: 10414">Inaction can be just as wicked as action.  Letting someone die when you can save them, at little to no risk to yourself, is evil, by the D&D definitions of morality.  Wizardru:You seem to be misinterpeting my comments.  CN characters would save someone if they took little to no risk by doing so, after all, why not?  I am not making an argument that CN=CG.  A CG character would risk their lives to save other people, while a CN would not.  Han Solo is the perfect example of a CN character in this regard.  Unless they have a personal reason to take risks to save others, they will not get involved.  However, they will help other people as long as they aren't really taking a great risk in doing so, or if they are personally involved with them.Getting back to the original topic, I still do not think the BoEF description of a Lawful Good characters stance on sexuality comes even close to what it should be.  The Good expression of sexuality would be love, yet that is not even mentioned.  A Lawful character would seek a long term or structured relationship, and again this is not even mentioned.  If LG is as other people in this thread have argued, what, may I ask, is the difference between LG and N?  Oh, and as for medieval Kings, I would classify the entire feudal system of the Dark Ages as being LE, and almost every single ruler from that period I have read of would fall under an evil alignment, as well.  So I certainly do not agree that LG characters would follow such behavioral patterns.</blockquote>

Verification