Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Life Without "the Gods" or Playing D&D without the DDG.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sword of Spirit" data-source="post: 6639537" data-attributes="member: 6677017"><p>The way I look at it, D&D's definition of what constitute a god has been incoherent for a long time. It isn't based on power, since there have been beings as (or even <em>more</em>) powerful than the gods (whether monstrous titanic entities, or unique persons like the Lady of Pain). It isn't totally based on worship, since arch-devils and demon princes have worshippers. It seems to be pretty darn arbitrary.</p><p></p><p>So here's how <em>I</em> do it, which can be interpreted as a setting without gods (or not, depending on how you look at it.)</p><p></p><p>Basically, a god is just what you call whatever you worship. It doesn't matter if its Zeus, Grazzt, Titania, or a troll with a rubber mask. It's a statement of <em>relationship</em> between you and some other being--it is not a creature type.</p><p></p><p>For the beings that have traditionally and arbitrarily been called gods, I basically refer to them as Immortals (with shades of BECMI), Powers (Planescape), or Immortal Powers. But I throw in the BECMI/Mystara twist that they are believed to all have originally been mortals. Because of this, worship tends to be softened to "following" for most people, and the terms god and deity (as <em>strong</em> relationship terms) are used much less often. Saying that such and so is your god or you worship such and so is less common that saying you follow the path of such and so. It isn't incorrect usage, but people might look at you funny if you use that sort of strong language on a regular basis.</p><p></p><p>As far as the actual source of divine power, I take the Immortals aspect even further. Divine power is just a natural part of the multiverse. It isn't divine because it comes from the Immortals--the Immortals are the Immortals because they have become filled with it. Basically Immortals are uber-clerics.</p><p></p><p>Clerics receive their spells through channeling divine energy--exactly as the Immortals themselves channel it. Generally this ability is ritually conferred on you through some sort of ordination, which you often get from other priests of a particular religions. But there isn't anything theoretically stopping one from finding a way to access this power without that. The important part is that your power isn't actually dependent on these Immortals. You don't get it from them, and they can't withhold it from you. Now, if they get wind that you are going around misbehaving in their name, and they are the type who cares and is active on their world, they might take corrective actions--but those actions involve sending servants, etc--not messing with your abilities.</p><p></p><p>In the final analysis, this results in a campaign that is more or less the same as standard D&D, with changes in how frequently certain terms are used and the ways powerful supernatural beings are viewed. Cosmologically, I get to throw in a bit of BECMI, Planescape, earlier edition openness to personally derived divine power, and old school, "we keep adventuring until we become gods" funness. </p><p></p><p>And, to focus on the point of the thread, the Athar Planescape faction have a pretty strong position with this take...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sword of Spirit, post: 6639537, member: 6677017"] The way I look at it, D&D's definition of what constitute a god has been incoherent for a long time. It isn't based on power, since there have been beings as (or even [I]more[/I]) powerful than the gods (whether monstrous titanic entities, or unique persons like the Lady of Pain). It isn't totally based on worship, since arch-devils and demon princes have worshippers. It seems to be pretty darn arbitrary. So here's how [I]I[/I] do it, which can be interpreted as a setting without gods (or not, depending on how you look at it.) Basically, a god is just what you call whatever you worship. It doesn't matter if its Zeus, Grazzt, Titania, or a troll with a rubber mask. It's a statement of [I]relationship[/I] between you and some other being--it is not a creature type. For the beings that have traditionally and arbitrarily been called gods, I basically refer to them as Immortals (with shades of BECMI), Powers (Planescape), or Immortal Powers. But I throw in the BECMI/Mystara twist that they are believed to all have originally been mortals. Because of this, worship tends to be softened to "following" for most people, and the terms god and deity (as [I]strong[/I] relationship terms) are used much less often. Saying that such and so is your god or you worship such and so is less common that saying you follow the path of such and so. It isn't incorrect usage, but people might look at you funny if you use that sort of strong language on a regular basis. As far as the actual source of divine power, I take the Immortals aspect even further. Divine power is just a natural part of the multiverse. It isn't divine because it comes from the Immortals--the Immortals are the Immortals because they have become filled with it. Basically Immortals are uber-clerics. Clerics receive their spells through channeling divine energy--exactly as the Immortals themselves channel it. Generally this ability is ritually conferred on you through some sort of ordination, which you often get from other priests of a particular religions. But there isn't anything theoretically stopping one from finding a way to access this power without that. The important part is that your power isn't actually dependent on these Immortals. You don't get it from them, and they can't withhold it from you. Now, if they get wind that you are going around misbehaving in their name, and they are the type who cares and is active on their world, they might take corrective actions--but those actions involve sending servants, etc--not messing with your abilities. In the final analysis, this results in a campaign that is more or less the same as standard D&D, with changes in how frequently certain terms are used and the ways powerful supernatural beings are viewed. Cosmologically, I get to throw in a bit of BECMI, Planescape, earlier edition openness to personally derived divine power, and old school, "we keep adventuring until we become gods" funness. And, to focus on the point of the thread, the Athar Planescape faction have a pretty strong position with this take... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Life Without "the Gods" or Playing D&D without the DDG.
Top