Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Light release schedule: More harm than good?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Majoru Oakheart" data-source="post: 6506757" data-attributes="member: 5143"><p>Maybe, maybe not. I've seen a lot of game store employees who wouldn't have the foresight to do that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I've definitely walked into a board game store and said "Wow..that game has 8 expansions? I think you have to REALLY like that game to get into it, otherwise you're looking at a large investment for nothing." I've definitely considered whether to buy a game or not based entirely on how many expansions were available.</p><p></p><p>So, yes, I believe it is incumbent on Wizards to make sure to release splat books at a slow enough pace that it doesn't overwhelm my game. "Controlling what enters my game" is a lot of work. It requires that I read through the book in its entirety in order to make sure there aren't any hidden synergies between abilities that will make one too powerful if I allow another one in. Reading a book generally takes me about 5-10 hours of dedicated reading time. Which is why I haven't even finished reading the Monster Manual or DMG yet. When my players start asking me if they can be stuff from the new book starting the week after the book comes out, I need to push aside things I'd rather do to make time to fully read and understand the book.</p><p></p><p>I haven't actually been doing that. I've been relying on WOTC to keep things balanced and just allowing everything. Unfortunately, that has come back to bite me in the past. Books coming out too quickly meant a lack of quality control on WOTC's end. I hope that books coming out less often will mean that'll be less of an issue.</p><p></p><p>However, most of the time the problem doesn't come from just one book. The problem comes from having too many options. Options interact with each other and the more interactions there are the more likely one combination of options will come out overpowered. Keeping the options low means lowering the chance this will happen. This is one of the major reasons I'm enjoying 5e right now. The lack of options means I'm not having rules arguments about weird interactions between stuff from 3 different books every session. Also, the low number of options is keeping my player's power gaming tendencies in check. People aren't constantly discussing their builds and the builds of the next 3 characters they plan on playing when this one dies.</p><p></p><p>Adding a lot of material will break that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You haven't been the same places I've been then. Nearly every thread I've ever read about the FR has a bunch of people showing up saying they hate the Realms because they feel overwhelmed by the amount of information available for it and they feel the need to know it ALL but it would take years of reading to read through all of it so they avoid it.</p><p></p><p>There will always be people willing to put in that effort because they are really dedicated. But most won't.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Wizards doesn't want to give people that impression, though. Most players get into the game by joining an established group. Which means they aren't DMing and don't need a MM or a DMG. They likely enjoyed the game enough that they want their own PHB to reference during the game. Then they "graduate" to DMing in a year or two after they start playing. Then they get the extra books. By that point, the players should be very familiar with what books they need.</p><p></p><p>That's how I started playing D&D back in the day. I joined a group of people I met on BBSes and a couple of weeks later, I bought a PHB. I didn't get any more books for a year or two. Then, I went a little crazy. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Still, WOTC wants there to be a path to start the game at around $50 without insinuating that you ever need to buy another book. They want the choice to be between that new video game for $60 dollars and being able to play D&D for $50.</p><p></p><p>Each book that is on the shelf is another reminder that you need to spend more and more money to "complete" your D&D game. Which is a barrier to entry for a lot of people.</p><p></p><p>Sure, the vast majority of the people here are mega nerds who are fairly obsessed with D&D and therefore the idea that someone would be turned off by more awesome books seems completely alien to us, but I remember when I first started being really paranoid about not being able to play the game "properly" if I didn't buy ALL the books.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Majoru Oakheart, post: 6506757, member: 5143"] Maybe, maybe not. I've seen a lot of game store employees who wouldn't have the foresight to do that. I've definitely walked into a board game store and said "Wow..that game has 8 expansions? I think you have to REALLY like that game to get into it, otherwise you're looking at a large investment for nothing." I've definitely considered whether to buy a game or not based entirely on how many expansions were available. So, yes, I believe it is incumbent on Wizards to make sure to release splat books at a slow enough pace that it doesn't overwhelm my game. "Controlling what enters my game" is a lot of work. It requires that I read through the book in its entirety in order to make sure there aren't any hidden synergies between abilities that will make one too powerful if I allow another one in. Reading a book generally takes me about 5-10 hours of dedicated reading time. Which is why I haven't even finished reading the Monster Manual or DMG yet. When my players start asking me if they can be stuff from the new book starting the week after the book comes out, I need to push aside things I'd rather do to make time to fully read and understand the book. I haven't actually been doing that. I've been relying on WOTC to keep things balanced and just allowing everything. Unfortunately, that has come back to bite me in the past. Books coming out too quickly meant a lack of quality control on WOTC's end. I hope that books coming out less often will mean that'll be less of an issue. However, most of the time the problem doesn't come from just one book. The problem comes from having too many options. Options interact with each other and the more interactions there are the more likely one combination of options will come out overpowered. Keeping the options low means lowering the chance this will happen. This is one of the major reasons I'm enjoying 5e right now. The lack of options means I'm not having rules arguments about weird interactions between stuff from 3 different books every session. Also, the low number of options is keeping my player's power gaming tendencies in check. People aren't constantly discussing their builds and the builds of the next 3 characters they plan on playing when this one dies. Adding a lot of material will break that. You haven't been the same places I've been then. Nearly every thread I've ever read about the FR has a bunch of people showing up saying they hate the Realms because they feel overwhelmed by the amount of information available for it and they feel the need to know it ALL but it would take years of reading to read through all of it so they avoid it. There will always be people willing to put in that effort because they are really dedicated. But most won't. Wizards doesn't want to give people that impression, though. Most players get into the game by joining an established group. Which means they aren't DMing and don't need a MM or a DMG. They likely enjoyed the game enough that they want their own PHB to reference during the game. Then they "graduate" to DMing in a year or two after they start playing. Then they get the extra books. By that point, the players should be very familiar with what books they need. That's how I started playing D&D back in the day. I joined a group of people I met on BBSes and a couple of weeks later, I bought a PHB. I didn't get any more books for a year or two. Then, I went a little crazy. ;) Still, WOTC wants there to be a path to start the game at around $50 without insinuating that you ever need to buy another book. They want the choice to be between that new video game for $60 dollars and being able to play D&D for $50. Each book that is on the shelf is another reminder that you need to spend more and more money to "complete" your D&D game. Which is a barrier to entry for a lot of people. Sure, the vast majority of the people here are mega nerds who are fairly obsessed with D&D and therefore the idea that someone would be turned off by more awesome books seems completely alien to us, but I remember when I first started being really paranoid about not being able to play the game "properly" if I didn't buy ALL the books. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Light release schedule: More harm than good?
Top