Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6543092" data-attributes="member: 22779">Totally agree with you. And Iousue has the right of my point. And just to add, the only reason we have Pathfinder is because there was no OGL. Had 4e had an OGL then Paizo wouldn't have even considered staying with 3e. Pathfinder was a huge risk. It paid off, but smart money would have stuck with 4e at the time instead of sinking hundreds of thousands of dollars into a system that was pretty much abandoned by everyone else.</blockquote>