Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 6543869" data-attributes="member: 22424">Fair enough, but some things are much easier than others, and easier to work around. For example, it would be very difficult at present to play a Dark Sun campaign in 5e at the moment as psionics is so integral to that setting and not currently supported.All true, and it's going to be difficult for WotC to square that circle.But there are reasonable expectations of support and unreasonable ones. Complaining because Shifter variant #276 isn't covered is one thing. But where something is large and therefore difficult to homebrew, where something is integral to one or more of the published settings, or where something was previously a core option that is now no longer supported, it's much less unreasonable to want support... and where the likelihood is that it will be years before it is supported, or indeed it may never be supported, it's not unreasonable to complain.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="delericho, post: 6543869, member: 22424"] Fair enough, but some things are [i]much[/i] easier than others, and easier to work around. For example, it would be very difficult at present to play a Dark Sun campaign in 5e at the moment as psionics is so integral to that setting and not currently supported. All true, and it's going to be difficult for WotC to square that circle. But there are reasonable expectations of support and unreasonable ones. Complaining because Shifter variant #276 isn't covered is one thing. But where something is large and therefore difficult to homebrew, where something is integral to one or more of the published settings, or where something was previously a core option that is now no longer supported, it's much less unreasonable to want support... and where the likelihood is that it will be years before it is supported, or indeed it may never be supported, it's not unreasonable to complain. [/QUOTE]

Verification